16386 or 16385??

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by alkykw, Oct 22, 2009.

  1. alkykw

    alkykw MDL Junior Member

    Mar 25, 2009
    55
    33
    0
    can confirm that the new build the present day, is 16386? or is what we have been using so far, 16385?
     
  2. Brainsuck

    Brainsuck MDL Addicted

    Oct 9, 2009
    666
    156
    30
    16385 is it :rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. night.fox

    night.fox MDL Member

    Sep 21, 2009
    121
    10
    10
    i just wonder... how to check the build number??? sorry i'm noob here :confused:
     
  4. Lich King

    Lich King MDL Addicted

    Sep 24, 2009
    500
    24
    30
    "msconfig" under tools tab.. launch system information :)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. night.fox

    night.fox MDL Member

    Sep 21, 2009
    121
    10
    10
    nice. thanks man. I appreciate it ^_^ i've got 16385 ^_^
     
  6. christantoan

    christantoan MDL Junior Member

    Jul 28, 2009
    54
    4
    0
    why I got 16397 ??
     
  7. HSChronic

    HSChronic MDL Expert

    Aug 25, 2007
    1,213
    56
    60
    are you using a loader of some sort? They modify system files and replace them with RC tokens.
     
  8. Brainsuck

    Brainsuck MDL Addicted

    Oct 9, 2009
    666
    156
    30
    If you used the rtm update pack one of the hotfix did it Mine is higher than your It is all good!!!:D
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. ShareAll

    ShareAll MDL Member

    Jul 23, 2009
    195
    0
    10
    For me i'm not using any loader. Used one Retail Key that still works :D
     
  10. christantoan

    christantoan MDL Junior Member

    Jul 28, 2009
    54
    4
    0
    I'm not using loader just mod bios, cert and serial
     
  11. dzadzev

    dzadzev MDL Junior Member

    Aug 3, 2009
    59
    2
    0
    Build number have nothing to do with loaders ... you may have different build number is you installed unofficial "leaked" updates ...
     
  12. Servi

    Servi MDL Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    111
    1
    10
    Or because of official hotfixes! I have 16416 now, was 16385.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  13. Mavet

    Mavet MDL Novice

    Aug 27, 2009
    13
    0
    0
    What hotfix did you use?
     
  14. Servi

    Servi MDL Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    111
    1
    10
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  15. Servi

    Servi MDL Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    111
    1
    10
    So what? Who talked about x86 or x64 ? :confused:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  16. sureshabhi777

    sureshabhi777 MDL Junior Member

    Jul 18, 2009
    52
    2
    0
    I also have 16416. why?
     
  17. Stannieman

    Stannieman MDL Guru

    Sep 4, 2009
    2,232
    1,800
    90
    I don't know what the 16416 is. But I think 16386 is just the same as 16385, 16385 is rtm x86 and 19386 is x64.
    Cause I have both x86 and x64 dutch iso's (checksum is msdn), the x86 is 16919 and the x64 iso is 16920, so it seems that the x64's buildnumber is always 1 higher than the x84 from the same language.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  18. Roli

    Roli MDL Novice

    Jun 5, 2009
    18
    0
    0
    #20 Roli, Oct 22, 2009
    Last edited: Oct 22, 2009