No. I have used them, and uploaded my iso to the internet. The iso will be in like arab, spanish, norwegian and so on. Well, when i get my links...
Downloads are OK if they: -aren't posted yet. -Match the hash published originally by M$ and the hashes are posted as well so the members can be absolutely sure to have them original.
-I havent seen any downloads here yet. (plz correct me if im wrong) -They match LostEds Sha-1 hashes from links provided by Tito higher in this post.
Since you are talking about downloadable iso's, we would be looking for hashes for the iso files, not the svf patch files.
The point would be to provide a means to verify a successful download of the iso, as well as a successfully applied patch and match to msdn hashes.
Hope i get them up by next week, this was my "big project" before summer, but now my link provider is stopping me (not answering mails, ticket) Also i have to upload at my school, due to a sh***y up-speed here. So it might take some time. But happy you look forwart to it.
If this is *really* super-important stuff, and I have my doubts, why not delete all but the first post then make it a sticky?
If I am interpreting this thread correctly, you are reversing what LostEd has done, i.e. downloading the posted diff files and using them to recreate the iso's. LostEd must have had the iso's at some point in order to create his patch files. It all seems rather circular, and largely a waste of time, but I guess it is your time.
Nice job, although the above link to SHA-1 file seems to have expired, and I doubt these were the hashes of your actual isofiles, since LostEd posted hashes of svf files. Why not post the SHA-1 values of you iso's in a separate spoiler box?
No, link still work for me. And if you look close, u will notice that LostEd posted a HASH file for the iso output, the same i use.