Maybe next time you could just warn ppl that you are point pumping your account and getting a few perks on the side, on some forums such actions would yield a ban for padding files but on a more positive not thanks for the mirror.
The 'Install OEM Information' feature works fine and installs the logos on the system drive. However, the 'Remove OEM Logo' feature in v1.3 still tries to delete the folder C:\Windows\System32\oobe\info, from the C: drive, even if the logos were installed by 7Loader on a different drive (my Win7 system drive is not C) causing a System.IO.DirectoryNotFoundException.
Oh, I mean my bios is modded to SLIC 2.1 and it works perfectly..I'm just wondering any difference in this 1.3 version? And is it worth doing whatever with this 1.3? Thanks for the quick reply
If you're already activated then you shouldn't worry. Loaders like this don't modify your BIOS, they "simulate" that you have SLIC 2.1 It could be identified as a "non invasive" method.
Awesome! Thanks ! I'll just be waiting for a new OEM key..until then, thanks for the 1.3. Helps the community !! Cheeeeers!
YES you deserve a ban.. But next time put some pr0n in and make me happy... For the rest i don't care that you make payloads.. BUT GIVE ME AT LEAST SOMETHING NICE TO WATCH!......
lmao... okay... Here is a link to all the unpacked files in v1.3(Updated) along with the loader... I will update the main post
Hah fair enough . I trust CPC_S and Hazar, so I could care less if its beta. Good luck with your 1.3 all ! When are the new OEM keys coming?!?! lol
Be patient guys new OEM keys will get leaked or should i say "borrowed" when Win 7 actually hits the stores.
I seriously doubt you can code, you're prolly just a reverse-engineer, like myself! Good for your. Here's a cookie. Ports 49171-49174 were opened, but no connections were established. Maybe you're on to something? Microsoft does it all the time! They push small companies to the brink of bankruptcy, and then buy them out for pennies on the dollar. Then they insert the acquired code into their products and pass it off as a genuine MS ingenuity.
Actually I know VB.NET, REALbasic, C++, C#, PHP, Perl & Python -- I just so happen to also know how to unpack/cr**k some applications... not that that matters. Microsoft may do it all the time but they are a big company, between users all putting out free act*vators it wouldn't be very hard to shown some credit where its due. The whole point in my original post was to show others whats inside of it & what I personally found odd. Where's the harm in that? They can either believe me, check themselves or say "no never, Orbit30 would NEVER do that" and be real idiotic towards me for only trying to help (mostly teens that do this that don't have a clue).
This was a major point of concern for a lot of people, but vb_master and jas0nuk dissasembled it on irc and found it to be part of an obscufcation program