It relates about people worried by (lack of) updates, which last time I checked, is the point of ESU. Whatever... is a news I shared, as is. Is up to each one to evaluate it.
Don´t trust 0patch.com it´s scam microsoft fixing it self for free and you are more save without a third party company on your pc.
Like I said I have no idea about who they are, but the whole point is about MS stopping to provide updates, so there is "not MS is fixing for free" unless they extend the esu (which I think is possible).
I don't feel is worth discussing the matter further, but, are you aware that you're supposed to pay both to use Win7 and to access the ESU? I understand a message like "I don't trust this company, because...", but everything else is just a pointless debate...
yes, what i mean is functionality and the worth of the software it’s only my opinion. i’m not going to start an argument i feel like this is originally gonna talk about how this impacts, not an opinion inator so idk. you can just go on.
Why do you are then here if not for the perfect BypassESU-v11 to have it for free from microsoft?!... I think 0Patch is a company from NSA and etc. to make a very good running botnet(wihout having software problems) and use our pc resources for free and you are so stupid to pay for those hidden company headquarters(no own running web-site this is suspicious for me etc.)!.
i feel like @acer-5100 expects that people pay to get those security things/updates since 0patch gives out even patches for windows 10 (idk about higher) that probably would get patched few months later and this is paid, it’s why i said “i don’t feel like talking about a paid software” also to defend against “you have to pay for windows 7 and bypassesu” it’s also probably kinda worthless to pay (but at the cost of warranty, but who cares even slightest bit) windows 7 activation has weakness (oem slp activation, such as daz loader and kms activation, such as kms_vl_all), so some people choose to activate such way and it’s thanks to the works of mdl therefore i have to agree with @new369one @ancestor(v) @Tito @Yen what do you think should be done to this thread? hate when arguments start
So a never heard user with 20 messages is here to question how much trustworthy a security company is.. Why should I take your concern as sincere? Whatever. I remember you AGAIN that ESUa are not free ESUs are a PAID service offered by MS for a LIMITED time, which make your argument pointless. AGAIN, you can trust that company or not, but you can't blame a paid SW just because you can't pirate it. @Chuterix Not sure what problem you have, but at my home an information is an information, a news is a news no matter if you like it or not. Unless you have some contrary infos the company behind 0patch is a SW house that makes money just like MS selling SW and/or services. If you don't like paid SW you have a whole world of free operating systems and SW. In that case you are in the wrong place.
sorry but i am just saying i am unfortunately don’t have an interest in this third party software. mostly interested in classic ms software/os.
20 messages and 4 likes Can you please put/set my number of posts to 1,452 and my likes to 980. Thank you so much; if you can do it for me to have better expertise than acer-5100.
i don’t think it works that way, sorry you’d have to have posted a lot (it could probably matter when you joined, but idk since i joined after you but yet i posted a lot) and the posts would have to be helpful like me in order to get a chance to get many likes sadly, you probably can’t stand a chance against @acer-5100 once again, i don’t want any hurtful arguments