Which seems to be more durable and long lasting? Daz Loader activation or KMS activation? It seems to me that Daz Loader activation seems more durable and long lasting as it's sort of genuine and can not be easily detected while KMS activation has risk if MS changes the protocol anytime. But experts' opinions count!
It depends completely on whether Microsoft has detected and marked dodgy activations (Daz-loader) on the server-side, or logged information that can be used to identify them at a later time. Of course, only Microsoft knows this. Personally, on any new sysems I install, I'll probably just do a Daz loader upgrade-activation, then reinstall, and if at some point Microsoft blacklists the activation, I'll just fall back to reactivating using KMS.