1. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,262
    94,711
    450
  2. Chibi ANUBIS

    Chibi ANUBIS MDL Chibi Developer

    Apr 28, 2014
    1,237
    911
    60
    Anyone have information for Windows 10 IoT 1903 ?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. Schroedinger2015

    Schroedinger2015 MDL Member

    Jul 16, 2015
    223
    150
    10
    Hi, I've a lot of difficulties upgrading my current Windows 10 build (18363.327) to 329 version.

    I've tried via DISM command and it returns an error.

    If I try uupdump to create ISO and run setup.exe it does not allow me to keep programs saying maybe I'm trying
    to install an older Windows 10 version and thus I can't update it in this way too.

    Is there anyone experiencing same issues around ?
     
  4. Trenchboygun

    Trenchboygun MDL Member

    Apr 8, 2013
    158
    92
    10
    please separate threads 18362.xxx and 18363.xxx
     
  5. Schroedinger2015

    Schroedinger2015 MDL Member

    Jul 16, 2015
    223
    150
    10
    I can't see your image file but I've 0x800f081f error using DISM, while if I compile ISO it says it can't upgrade it as I'm trying to install an older Windows version.
     
  6. Mišulda

    Mišulda MDL Novice

    Jul 1, 2014
    31
    11
    0
  7. Trenchboygun

    Trenchboygun MDL Member

    Apr 8, 2013
    158
    92
    10
  8. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,262
    94,711
    450
  9. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,262
    94,711
    450
    The Release Preview CU is the same for both, only the 1909 enablement package makes the difference between 18362 or 18363.
     
  10. Windows 10 User

    Windows 10 User MDL Expert

    Feb 2, 2017
    1,908
    118
    60
    Sorry, but can somebody help me?

    May Storage Sense delete somes files and folders I don't want it to like the ones from the Documents folder (like if it was selected as Edge's download folder or something like that)?

    How can I recover Chrome's jumplist? I lost "New window" and "New incognito window", I don't know why (if must be a Windows setting or program removing it since I'm always losing it after installing Chrome for the first time).

    Also, if I disable all notifications on the Notifications tab on the Settings app and not disable the ones from Focus Assist (if these are notifications at all, I don't know) as well as not disable it (Focus Assist) may I have any kind of notifications on the Action Center (and maybe in other places)?
     
  11. 600415

    600415 MDL Member

    Aug 31, 2015
    214
    259
    10
    @Schroedinger2015 yes, they removed some components in .329, and also .327 had a corrupt component
    I will post a fix in a few hours
     
  12. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,262
    94,711
    450
    Your fixes seem to work but i am having a hard time with the conclusion that every post 18362.239 update contains the same faults.
     
  13. 600415

    600415 MDL Member

    Aug 31, 2015
    214
    259
    10
    no, they are different types of faults
    Most of the time problems occur because new update reverts components back to .1 — I guess this happens because they're built from a different branch
    The only two actually corrupt updates i noticed were
    .10013 (amd64_microsoft-windows-c..cal.desktop.cortana had a corrupt reverse delta bc it had less files than .1 version of same components)
    .327 (amd64_hyperv-compute-guestcomputeservice component is incorrectly marked as new instead of updated — and that's on top of the trouble with .329 reverting some components back to .1)
    In short, the new forward-reverse delta system generates more trouble than it's worth. “Agile” development at its finest.

    IIRC they have solved the .263 problem in later updates by re-adding the relevant component. I think solving .10013 and .327 requires either a servicing stack/WU update or a change in how the updates are built bc the process does not know the old update has bugs

    That's to say, i haven't noticed these problems in any public updates, only RP ones