[DISCUSSION] Windows Server 2025 (Build 26100)

Discussion in 'Windows Server' started by Tito, Jan 25, 2024.

  1. DrunkF

    DrunkF MDL Junior Member

    Jun 15, 2010
    78
    23
    0
    So you're doing both NTFS compression and the LZX also?

    I assume you mean you're booting the host from a VHDX also. That's an idea.
     
  2. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150
    Yes because the modern LZX doesn't inherit the compressed status. (change a bit in a txt file and it becomes uncompressed.

    The ntfs compression mitigates that. With my way modified LXZ compressed becomes NTFS compressed, bigger than the original but not as big as the uncompressed one.

    Obviously once in some months I recompress the whole partition to recover what went lost (because updates temporary files, user profiles and so on.

    That's not an idea, that's the best thing that MS did in the past two decades, it made old school bacups, ISOs , setup.exe, and so on obsolete overnight. But people is so stuck in the past that didn't notice in 15 years
     
  3. LiteOS

    LiteOS Windowizer

    Mar 7, 2014
    2,343
    1,048
    90
  4. maur0

    maur0 MDL Senior Member

    Aug 3, 2012
    395
    178
    10
    Windows Server 2025 will also enable Bitlocker when installing OS. Will it encrypt all disks without a user if you want to be able to choose as in 11 24h2?
     
  5. LiteOS

    LiteOS Windowizer

    Mar 7, 2014
    2,343
    1,048
    90
    i mostly use dism to deploy images to vhd
    and in hyper-v i use gen1 so cant say for sure sry
     
  6. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150
    Native vhdx and mbr partitions here as well, but Android enforces that since android 7 or so (if you don't use a custom rom and /or a patched kernel), so it's matter of time before MS start copying yet another idiotic Apple's idea.
     
  7. cbsvitzer

    cbsvitzer MDL Senior Member

    Feb 4, 2010
    251
    159
    10
    When can we expect to se build 26100 of Server 2025?
     
  8. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150

    Never?

    We are already at build 26212
     
  9. cbsvitzer

    cbsvitzer MDL Senior Member

    Feb 4, 2010
    251
    159
    10
    What I want is build 26100 because I assume it will have no expiration date, just like client 26100
     
  10. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150

    I'm afraid doesn't work this way. Just like the last round the final Server will not be on the same build as the final LTSx.

    If you want a final Server 11 the only way yet is to use 25398, but that isn't a ready meal.

    upload_2024-5-16_22-53-16.png
     
  11. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,784
    340
    Server 26100 is already available internally, and will align and released with Windows 11 24H2
     
  12. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150
    @abbodi1406

    If you are right, usually you are, would be a very odd scheme.

    Where is the value in QC of releasing publicly builds past 26100, but keeping the final version behind a curtain?

    Maybe may memory is failing butI don't remember a previous windows release where they followed that path
     
  13. Paul Mercer

    Paul Mercer MDL Expert

    Apr 6, 2018
    1,942
    4,167
    60
    this year build 26100 is for client Windows 11 24H2, client Windows 11 LTSC 24H2 (also called 2024 but it says 24H2 in About menu), Server 2025 and Azure Stack HCI 24H2
    also Dev channel is 26120 (26100 + EP)
    Xbox should get build 26100 in august as well

    for example build 26100.553 is available as internal for both server editions:
    [Internal Corpnet Required] Windows Server 2025 (26100.553)
    [Internal Corpnet Required] Feature update to Azure Stack HCI, version 24H2 (26100.553)

    they didn't released 26100 ISO for both client and server builds and just moved on to the new canary updates

    available server editions for en-us lang:
    ServerDatacenterCore_en-us.esd
    ServerDatacenter_en-us.esd
    ServerStandardCore_en-us.esd
    ServerStandard_en-us.esd
    ServerTurbineCore_en-us.esd
    ServerTurbine_en-us.esd
    ServerAzureStackHCICor_en-us.esd
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  14. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150
    #54 acer-5100, May 17, 2024
    Last edited: May 17, 2024
    Ok.

    But while I understand the "how" part, I still miss the "why"

    In server 2022 they released the .1 build labeling it as "preview", giving the opportunity to guinea pigs to spot any evident last minute bug, then they released officially the 20348.169.

    Which was a good way to both please the early adopters, and to mark as release a fairly robust and bug free build.

    It made sense
     
  15. LiteOS

    LiteOS Windowizer

    Mar 7, 2014
    2,343
    1,048
    90
    is there notes about the updates in that channel
    like what needs fixing and what got fix

    wondering if it close to be ready
     
  16. Paul Mercer

    Paul Mercer MDL Expert

    Apr 6, 2018
    1,942
    4,167
    60
    #56 Paul Mercer, May 17, 2024
    Last edited: May 17, 2024
    only filenames with file sizes and sha-1 checksums are available
    metadata can't be downloaded without their VPN

    as for the changelogs, I've never seen them

    build 26100.1 is pretty rough, I think they want to release some huge LCU first
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. acer-5100

    acer-5100 MDL Guru

    Dec 8, 2018
    4,003
    2,923
    150
    In a sane developent cycle, supposedly, almost everything is fixed during the long phase before the final major build number.

    Roughness should be ironed out in latest major builds 26040, 26067 and so on, then the changes from last preview like 26085 to 26100 should be practically just the build number.

    In the way they are following, instead the major and minor build numbers are completely meaningless.

    At this point just forget release cycles, and make windows a Arch like full rolling release.
     
  18. maddogster

    maddogster MDL Senior Member

    Mar 23, 2015
    321
    113
    10
    remember oem's and major enterprise already have for testing as they come first; us lurkers rely on leaks and hackers :p
     
  19. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    17,209
    90,784
    340