Firefox Quantum (not as great as they make it out to be)

Discussion in 'Application Software' started by RanCorX2, Dec 7, 2018.

  1. RanCorX2

    RanCorX2 MDL Addicted

    Jul 19, 2009
    920
    491
    30
    #1 RanCorX2, Dec 7, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2018
  2. lolnothankyou

    lolnothankyou MDL Novice

    Jul 27, 2018
    48
    58
    0
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. RanCorX2

    RanCorX2 MDL Addicted

    Jul 19, 2009
    920
    491
    30
    #3 RanCorX2, Dec 9, 2018
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2018
    (OP)
    you sound like an advert.

    i'm already aware of those links and they did nothing for me performance wise.
    the 2nd link is for privacy tweaks.

    shouldn't have to do all that bs, firefox has been getting more and more bloated, it's like microsoft are running the business instead of mozilla...
    i configured it correctly and it was not the best browser.

    do explain, why quantum, chrome, opera consume gigabytes of memory? when pale moon and possibly other non big name browsers don't.
    it's because they are unoptimized, full of extra background scripts etc.

    as i said i have more or less an identical selection of addons on both browsers, yet one uses 1gb+ and pale moon hovers around 5xxmb.

    just wish i discovered pm ages ago would've saved me lots of browser testing & switching......
     

    Attached Files:

    • ffq.jpg
      ffq.jpg
      File size:
      56.7 KB
      Views:
      29
  4. s1ave77

    s1ave77 Has left at his own request

    Aug 15, 2012
    16,135
    24,092
    340
    Errrm, for FF it's the new Multi Process design (electrolysis), no clue about the others. Disable it and you have the behavior of pre-quantum versions like Palemoon.
    https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...-17763-1-107-pc-r.77945/page-215#post-1489077
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. annieannie

    annieannie MDL Novice

    Sep 25, 2009
    28
    4
    0
    PM uses single thread while firefox quantom uses multithread so each add on is a new process. that's why it takes a lot of memory.
    If you continue having PM open, eventually the memory PM takes will be over 1G.
    Also quantom firefox is not that fast, under SSD, almost all browsers are fast, including PM and old version of firefox (v56).
    I found another browser called K-meleon, using PM render engine Goanna now and it's very fast and takes low memory. Not many addons though, so I only use it for casual browsing.
     
  6. Tiger-1

    Tiger-1 MDL Guru

    Oct 18, 2014
    4,170
    4,729
    150
    NO issues with FFQ, I have a lot of memory This way I do not worry at all :p:D
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. onepic

    onepic MDL Junior Member

    Oct 7, 2011
    55
    7
    0
    From 64.0 no integrated RSS reader :(
     
  8. ratzlefatz

    ratzlefatz MDL FUBAR Recon Squad

    Sep 1, 2012
    1,203
    3,814
    60
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. lolnothankyou

    lolnothankyou MDL Novice

    Jul 27, 2018
    48
    58
    0
    user.js + uMatrix + uBlock Origin + delete all .xpi = performance

    Firefox 52 (and probably Pale Moon) does use much less RAM but in my experience is less responsive than Firefox 60. Go figure.

    My computer has 4GB of RAM and I prefer Firefox 60 over Firefox 52 performance-wise.

    Loading all my bookmarks at once takes 1.5-2GB of RAM (~40 tabs). Windows 7 takes 800MB.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. ICY007

    ICY007 MDL Novice

    May 8, 2015
    2
    0
    0
    Icy007
    I agree completly with RanCorX2 as i have tried out Firefox Quantum
    i also give up onto Opera ,Vivaldi and a lot of others
    Most of the time i use commodo dragon & iron 64 bit,they are good but not perfect
    I also use IE explorer 11
    sporadic i use Qtweb
    and BrowzarWinstyle2000,this is based onto the core off IE explorer, no active x,cleanup of index.dat,cookies,history,flash & java data when closing ,a bizarre browser,worth a try
    i am going to try Palemoon now, i used it many years ago
     
  11. beetlejuice89

    beetlejuice89 MDL Novice

    Oct 18, 2017
    3
    1
    0
    Well, the memory leak on FFQ has been a sore point since version 57. Die hard FF fanatics will treat it as a normal behaviour. The problem is, atleast for me that FF nowadays have a lot of visual elements. Just disabling animations make RAM usage & CPU usage bit lower. I really love FF & what it can do. But at the end of the day it lacks too many things that I need. And for other chromium browsers, you can try Cent Browser.
     
  12. LiteOS

    LiteOS MDL Expert

    Mar 7, 2014
    1,657
    706
    60
    I have also lag with version 57
    So i use classic yt addon
     
  13. s1ave77

    s1ave77 Has left at his own request

    Aug 15, 2012
    16,135
    24,092
    340
    No wonder, only Chrome is able to handle the propriatary system correctly, FF needs the addon and edge a user script via greasemonkey to fallback to the old youtube 'engine'.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...