Fresh Windows 10 Install - UUP vs ESD

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by MonarchX, Mar 23, 2017.

  1. MonarchX

    MonarchX MDL Expert

    May 5, 2007
    1,732
    310
    60
    #1 MonarchX, Mar 23, 2017
  2. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    35,566
    59,628
    450
    #2 Enthousiast, Mar 23, 2017
    The files are exactly the same, only UUP iso's lack the boot index2.

    It should not matter which source is used, if it runs 100% now, it could be coincidental, i haven't tried yet.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    12,067
    55,424
    340
    #3 abbodi1406, Mar 23, 2017
    When this obsession with SFC and RestoreHealth is going to end?
    it's like some users download new builds just to execute these two overrated commands and then complain
     
  4. jgdaqs

    jgdaqs MDL Novice

    Jun 25, 2015
    23
    10
    0
    #4 jgdaqs, Mar 23, 2017
    My UUP version and the original ESD version DO differ slightly - there's a couple different packages in the UUP version, one related to ieframe, another related to the migration functionality. The file dates differ by 7 minutes on these newer packages. (17:55 instead of 17:48).
     
  5. jeff69dini

    jeff69dini MDL Addicted

    Nov 22, 2008
    964
    226
    30
    #5 jeff69dini, Mar 23, 2017
    what is the significance of lacking boot index 2?
     
  6. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    35,566
    59,628
    450
    #6 Enthousiast, Mar 23, 2017
    Non. :):):)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. pf100

    pf100 MDL Expert

    Oct 22, 2010
    1,906
    3,055
    60
    #7 pf100, Mar 26, 2017
    It'll end when people stop wanting to check the integrity of their system files.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. d5aqoëp

    d5aqoëp MDL Senior Member

    Jan 19, 2017
    389
    240
    10
    #8 d5aqoëp, Mar 26, 2017
    Thank you very much.

    1st scenario: Your Windows is f***ed up but sfc /scannow says no problem found. But you know something is wrong.
    2nd scenario: Your Windows is working normally yet sfc /scannow finds errors and is unable to correct them

    SFC and RestoreHealth commands do nothing to fix problems.
     
  9. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    35,566
    59,628
    450
    #9 Enthousiast, Mar 26, 2017
    Wasn't the problem with all 10240 x64 editions that sfc /scannow couldn't be used, we all survived ;)
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. s1ave77

    s1ave77 Has left at his own request

    Aug 15, 2012
    16,130
    24,279
    340
    #10 s1ave77, Mar 26, 2017
    ^^ Iirc was a hickup in components store, missing info regarding new files compression. Was fixed soon after.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...