I have already installed WZOR touched iso version. Although i have also downloaded the untouched iso. Is there really a need to reinstall again using the untouched iso?
You just posted in the other thread that compared the hashes. The numbers don't lie. The hashes are the same for every file that the two releases share, most importantly, install.wim. So what do you think?
You're an idiot. You obviously don't understand the concept of hashing, so let me break it down for you. Hashing is a method of semi-uniquely identifying a file as genuine and unmodified. For all intents and purposes, MD5 and CRC hashes are unique. The earlier leaked releases are lacking two files that limit the installation to only the Ultimate Edition, and also have one extra file, MediaMeta.xml that is most likely residual from the download method that the original leaker used in order to obtain the software. No other files have changed, and therefore, are untouched. There is no reason to reinstall unless you gain some sort of pleasure from doing so.
btw just curious do the file dates also determine or change the hashes? because i noticed that the file dates are different in both versions.
yeah . i was almost very tempted to reinstall everything using the untouched iso. i will save the hassle then. thanks.
missing important files its simple. which is better: buy brand new item or OPEN BOX??? of course you want non-open box. It is possible that wzor put virus in windows
I'm sorry, do you speak English? I didn't say to rephrase, I asked if you could elaborate. What files are missing, and why are they important. There isn't any virus in the WZor release, which is identical to the release initially put-out by the Chinese leaker.
why would WZOR want to put virus into their iso. anyway i am already using WZOR's release and i have installed nod32 antivirus. did full scan and no virus or whatever detected. somebody has already done a hash by hash check on both the isos and proven that the contents in both isos are the same. anyway its understandable that some people do prefer using or installing something which is original and untouched. for example , the same goes for choosing your wife/ girlfriend. some people do mind that their girlfriend or wife is a virgin, and there are some who don't.
quit the argument guys. It's up to you to choose touched or untouched windows 7. As long as both is in good condition and genuine, I'll take either of it.
I don't usually waste my time responding to idiots, but I'll make an exception in your case. If you took the time to read the thread you posted this crap in you would know that the files that are missing are used by the install to control which version the DVD will install. The extra file does not contain any executable code and therefore is not a virus. If it is true that all the other files hash out to be the same, then there is absolutely NO DIFFERENCE in the final install. (Unless you installed something other than Ultimate, in which case you've done something you can't do with the untouched DVD without first "touching" it) In short, thanks WZOR for the super early copy of win7!
C'mon don't start a fight guys, from what I know WZOR ISO has no "ei.cfg" so you could choose the SKU, but it has a file "mediadata.xml", I don't know what's the use, probably not important, maybe it's some song you sing before playing the Russian Roulette LOL.
The install.wim files in both touched and untouched leaks have the same checksums. You can check this with hashtab, enable all the checksums if you dont trust SHA1 or MD5 and compare. The reason some of us want an untouched ISO is more emotional than rational. Both editions are fine to install as they contain the same files. It is just nice to know the ISO is untouched and genuine MS. Debates about it are as useful as debating your favourite colour or food. To answer the question of OP; no.