Thank you . That is self evident . What i was trying to point out is ---- > 2010 is xxx100.dll 2012 is xxx110.dll 2013 is xxx120.dll 2019 is xxx140.dll ....... and so is 2022
What I never understood is why MS refuses integrate those (small by today standards) components straight in the ISO images (and CUs), given they are needed by 95% of the users. @abbodi1406 Do you have a reasonable explanation for that?
They are afraid of being accused to monopolize their MSVC compiler maybe Raymond Chen (oldnewthing) explained it some time ago
Thanks So they are not ashamed to bundle .net things, Hyper-V, Defender, Edge and so on to fight Oracle, VMware, Symantec, Mcafee, Google, Mozilla, Opera... But are too timid to include a few stupid dlls ? Incredible, very likely the right explanation, but still incredible
I want to ask which version is better. In terms of version 14.29.30130.2 is larger sequence number. But about the release date it is after 14.29.30040.0. And the size is also smaller than 14.29.30040.0. What I'm asking is which version is better.