touched iso does not mean = fake

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by ryan80, Jul 19, 2009.

  1. ryan80

    ryan80 MDL Member

    Apr 30, 2009
    152
    1
    10
    i think many are confused about this. even though the iso is homemade. it does not mean its fake. it was just leaked with uncompressed iso, with all the files and folders. but i believe that nothing inside is fake.
     
  2. PrEzi

    PrEzi MDL Addicted

    Aug 23, 2007
    534
    3
    30
    Correction - it wasn't leaked as uncompressed iso.
    It was leaked as files copied from the actual disc (without the ability to boot them from the disc when burned).
    That's why the bootloader was taken from older build and added to the final files - the iso's hash is then changed.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. ryan80

    ryan80 MDL Member

    Apr 30, 2009
    152
    1
    10
    problem is, does anybody know the hash / sha1 of the original ISO?
     
  4. PrEzi

    PrEzi MDL Addicted

    Aug 23, 2007
    534
    3
    30
    #4 PrEzi, Jul 19, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    The most trustworthy hashes are from mspcbeta - our Chinese friend that leaked both 16384 and 16385 builds.

    Code:
    Originally Posted by mspcbeta  
    7600.16385.win7_rtm.090713-1255 is build!
    
    7600.16385.090713-1255_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULFRER_EN_DVD.iso
    SHA1: 5395DC4B38F7BDB1E005FF414DEEDFDB16DBF610
    SIZE: 2,501,894,144Byte
    
    7600.16385.090713-1255_x64fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_EN_DVD.iso
    SHA1: 326327CC2FF9F05379F5058C41BE6BC5E004BAA7
    SIZE: 3,224,686,592Byte
    
    7600.16385.090713-1255_x86fre_client_zh-cn_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULFRER_CN_DVD.iso
    SHA1: B589336602E3B7E134E222ED47FC94938B04354F
    
    7600.16385.090713-1255_x64fre_client_zh-cn_Retail_Ultimate-GRMCULXFRER_CN_DVD.iso
    SHA1: 4A98A2F1ED794425674D04A37B70B9763522B0D4
    
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. ryan80

    ryan80 MDL Member

    Apr 30, 2009
    152
    1
    10
    #5 ryan80, Jul 19, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2009
    (OP)
    even those might not be the original SHA1, frankly speaking , i don't think he can be 100% trusted. we don't even know if he is the original person who leaked the files. nobody knows.

    don't forget that WZOR also claimed theirs is the untouched iso. so we don't know the truth yet. but if you ask me. i rather trust the russians.
     
  6. PrEzi

    PrEzi MDL Addicted

    Aug 23, 2007
    534
    3
    30
    I agree however I added - most trustworthy. I didn't said that these are 100% genuine.
    He (or she) is the closes person to the 'real deal'.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. servaff

    servaff MDL Novice

    Jul 19, 2009
    8
    0
    0
    Just wait a couple more days are ull have a final aimed for the MSDN.