[Update] Rufus USB Tool

Discussion in 'Application Software' started by user_hidden, Dec 3, 2013.

  1. vze2mp9g

    vze2mp9g MDL Senior Member

    Oct 13, 2012
    396
    54
    10
    #381 vze2mp9g, Sep 28, 2018
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2018
    Hello
    I'm using a standard Windows 10 64bit ISO and I keep getting an error:

    RUFUS2.JPG

    This is my RUFUS.LOG file:

    Code:
    Rufus version: 3.3.1400
    Windows version: Windows 10 64-bit (Build 17134)
    Syslinux versions: 4.07/2013-07-25, 6.03/2014-10-06
    Grub versions: 0.4.6a, 2.02
    System locale ID: 0x0409
    Will use default UI locale 0x0409
    SetLGP: Successfully set NoDriveTypeAutorun policy to 0x0000009E
    Localization set to 'en-US'
    Found USB 2.0 device 'Patriot Memory USB Device' (058F:6387)
    1 device found
    Disk type: Removable, Disk size: 32 GB, Sector size: 512 bytes
    Cylinders: 3824, Tracks per cylinder: 255, Sectors per track: 63
    Partition type: GPT, NB Partitions: 2
    Disk GUID: {AC5D33C7-9AD2-46A3-8A92-F571CA97401E}
    Max parts: 128, Start Offset: 17408, Usable = 31457245696 bytes
    Partition 1:
      Type: {EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7}
      Name: 'Microsoft Basic Data'
      ID: {401824A8-F23B-4DDF-9ECC-5628C5630148}
      Size: 29.3 GB (31455148032 bytes)
      Start Sector: 2048, Attributes: 0x0000000000000000
    Partition 2 (UEFI:NTFS):
      Type: {EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7}
      Name: 'UEFI:NTFS'
      ID: {258BF116-F5BC-4215-B2F4-37CD935C7111}
      Size: 512 KB (524288 bytes)
      Start Sector: 61437884, Attributes: 0x0000000000000000
    Scanning image...
    ISO analysis:
      Image is an UDF image
    Disk image analysis:
      Image does not have an x86 Master Boot Record
    ISO label: '20180928_080659'
      Size: 5.1 GB (Projected)
      Has a >4GB file
      Uses: EFI
      Uses: Bootmgr (BIOS and UEFI)
      Uses: Install.wim (version 0.13.1)
    Using image: 17134.112.180619-1212.RS4_RELEASE_SVC_REFRESH_CLIENTCONSUMER_OEMRET_X64FRE_EN-US-UPDATED.iso (5.1 GB)
    
    Format operation started
    Requesting disk access...
    Opened \\.\PHYSICALDRIVE2 for exclusive write access
    Requesting lock...
    Will use 'G:' as volume mountpoint
    I/O boundary checks disabled
    Requesting lock...
    Analyzing existing boot records...
    Drive has a Zeroed Master Boot Record
    Volume has an unknown Partition Boot Record
    Clearing MBR/PBR/GPT structures...
    Erasing 128 sectors
    Deleting partitions...
    Partitioning (GPT)...
    Adding extra partition
    Reserved 33 tracks (1 MB) for extra partition
    Writing UEFI:NTFS partition...
    Closing existing volume...
    Waiting for logical drive to reappear...
    Formatting (NTFS)...
    Using cluster size: 4096 bytes
    Quick format was selected
    Volume is in use
    Format error: The device is in use by another process. Please close any other process that may be accessing the device.
    \\?\Volume{688341e6-c30a-11e8-8b31-0c5415807c70}\ was already mounted as G:\
    Re-mounted volume as 'G:' after error
    
    Found USB 2.0 device 'Patriot Memory USB Device' (058F:6387)
    1 device found
    Disk type: Removable, Disk size: 32 GB, Sector size: 512 bytes
    Cylinders: 3824, Tracks per cylinder: 255, Sectors per track: 63
    Partition type: GPT, NB Partitions: 2
    Disk GUID: {AF415707-8159-4343-93ED-867CC8392E5C}
    Max parts: 128, Start Offset: 17408, Usable = 31457245696 bytes
    Partition 1:
      Type: {EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7}
      Name: 'Microsoft Basic Data'
      ID: {D6726CF9-EE44-42BD-B21D-3FB5514BA533}
      Size: 29.3 GB (31455148032 bytes)
      Start Sector: 2048, Attributes: 0x0000000000000000
    Partition 2 (UEFI:NTFS):
      Type: {EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7}
      Name: 'UEFI:NTFS'
      ID: {B06CF5C1-30B3-4378-8FE6-7495B8C3F8AA}
      Size: 512 KB (524288 bytes)
      Start Sector: 61437884, Attributes: 0x0000000000000000
    

    See anything that's not right?
    Thank You
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. dekayd

    dekayd MDL Novice

    Feb 28, 2010
    5
    0
    0
  3. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    17,696
    15,715
    340
    @Akeo

    I was informed about the situation by a not-so-technical friend couple of hours ago, stumbled on similar issues, then checked your GitHub repos and found out the temp HTTP one. Started writing a query mail, then spotted this announcement.

    Hope things gonna be alright ASAP. On the other hand, have you identified the source of the attack? Are they typical scriptkiddies or part of a larger thingy? Any plan to switch to Cloudflare or similar in future?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Akeo

    Akeo MDL Member

    Dec 10, 2013
    152
    857
    10
    Cloudflare didn't help much. Source of the attack is distributed, but I have a fairly good idea of who's behind these attacks since they aren't that smart. That's all I will say about it.
     
  5. Ultra Male

    Ultra Male MDL Expert

    May 30, 2014
    1,183
    565
    60
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,158
    3,194
    60
    It is a portable version. It even says so at the top when running: "Rufus 3.4.1426 (Beta) (Portable)" :cool:
     
  7. Ultra Male

    Ultra Male MDL Expert

    May 30, 2014
    1,183
    565
    60
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. Flipp3r

    Flipp3r MDL Expert

    Feb 11, 2009
    1,557
    664
    60
    You've got to download & run it to find that out though. I'd already visited the site myself & thought it was the install version so skipped it...
     
  9. PointZero

    PointZero MDL Member

    Oct 5, 2011
    1,158
    3,194
    60
    Sorry, I didn't mean for my post to make you feel that way. Was just passing along info I saw. :)

    I agree that maybe Akeo could put "(Portable Version)" by the beta ones so it is clear to users.
     
  10. Carlos Detweiller

    Carlos Detweiller MDL Spinning Tortoise

    Dec 21, 2012
    2,722
    2,346
    90
    That's actually a VERY smart way of handling things. I bet the two executables on the server are even just symlinked. :cool:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. Carlos Detweiller

    Carlos Detweiller MDL Spinning Tortoise

    Dec 21, 2012
    2,722
    2,346
    90
    Unfortunately, whenever one depends on third-party services, there are always some sacrifices to make. That's how the cookie crumbles. :vertag:
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. Akeo

    Akeo MDL Member

    Dec 10, 2013
    152
    857
    10
    Yeah. The problem is when you try not to depend on third-party services you eventually get DDoS'd, which is the precise reason why I had to ditch the custom server and move to github. I had been doing the VPS dance for years before that, but those who think that it doesn't take that much time and/or that "You just need to slap CloudFlare on top of it and you're good" have never had to try to reliably deliver millions of downloads each month, and, in the process, attract a bunch of people who'd like nothing better but to disrupt your operations... As far as I'm concerned, it's a lose-lose situation. So I'd rather have github's dedicated network team, who I know have weathered much larger DDoS attacks, handle the usual stream of ill-wishers one attracts when one gets slightly successful...