Updating 10240 to 10586 - download update or use 10586 ISO?

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by MonarchX, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. MonarchX

    MonarchX MDL Expert

    May 5, 2007
    1,274
    199
    60
    I recall that during 10240 to 10586 update process, Windows downloaded the huge update and proceeded to install it as if it was an OS upgrade... There's another PC with Windows 10 10240 that I need to update and I wonder whether I should download the large update and apply it OR just use official Windows 10 10586 ISO and install it on top 10240?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  2. lobo11

    lobo11 TOMAHAWK CHOP

    Feb 16, 2012
    6,414
    4,235
    210
    I would think it depends on whether you want clean install or not:D
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. EFA11

    EFA11 Avatar Guru

    Oct 7, 2010
    8,795
    6,762
    270
    either way the update comes out the same. the ISO is only really needed for a clean install.
     
  4. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    14,758
    16,990
    340
    I preferre to use the iso option, i believe the upgrade by wu doesn't let you choose what to keep (it keeps all by default) and the iso gives a choice.

    The iso could be modified to your preferences, the wu upgrade not.
     
  5. dhjohns

    dhjohns MDL Guru

    Sep 5, 2013
    3,285
    1,716
    120
    I have always had much better luck using iso.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. Flipp3r

    Flipp3r MDL Expert

    Feb 11, 2009
    1,520
    652
    60
    Yeah just run the setup from the iso...
     
  7. CODYQX4

    CODYQX4 MDL Developer

    Sep 4, 2009
    4,804
    45,146
    150
    I would get the ISO and upgrade from that.

    I absolutely could not get WU to get to 100% on my VM (which would eventually start the setup), despite it downloading everything, but ISO method worked just fine.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. pf100

    pf100 MDL Addicted

    Oct 22, 2010
    857
    839
    30
    Another vote for the iso.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  9. egroups_megapics

    egroups_megapics MDL Member

    Aug 12, 2009
    121
    62
    10
    Would suggest ISO download and upgrade using it.

    In case you install 10240 and then run update it would download 3/4gb installation. In future if you re-install it would again follow same steps. keeping 10586 iso would make your future re-install simple saving time and data download.
     
  10. lobo11

    lobo11 TOMAHAWK CHOP

    Feb 16, 2012
    6,414
    4,235
    210
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  11. bpwnes

    bpwnes MDL Member

    Aug 11, 2015
    151
    27
    10
    I did a couple upgrades side by side on same hardware, one via USB installer and the other by MCT. Surprisingly the MCT finished way before the USB install. I couldn't tell you why, but I do know the ISO method checked for updates way longer than the MCT did. This was the only time I've tried it tho, and it may not be the case in every instance.