Warning - All 7600 are Fake

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by wildky63, Jul 14, 2009.

  1. wildky63

    wildky63 MDL Novice

    Jan 8, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    Lamer are only changing the Build #. Rtm is Not Out the
    Win 7 & Server 2008 R2 - 7600 13864 are 100% Fake

    Why you ask:
    1.) Build Botnet
    2.) To Laugh & Control.

    I've just started review the Complete Binary to see if its a Botnet attempt.

    Fraud ex: Server 2008 R2 7600.16384 = 6.1.7033.1 beta released Feb. 2009.

    To change all build # takes alot of time & test to cover up.

    Double check you Systems for Virus & Botnet,Rootkits.

    Sorry tobe the Messenger of such bad news. Someone Plained this for a Long Time & worked hard.

    4 Beta from Wzor so far confirmed Fraud. the Timeline & build they claim is 100% b/s.

    :mad:
     
  2. mspcbeta

    mspcbeta MDL Novice

    Jul 12, 2009
    40
    0
    0
    7600.16384 is not RTM final!
     
  3. wildky63

    wildky63 MDL Novice

    Jan 8, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    The Builds are Fake. not even within last Month.

    Server 2008 r2 : 7600 = 7033 from Feb.
     
  4. stimey

    stimey MDL Member

    Apr 21, 2008
    169
    5
    10
    Guys you need to provide some proof and not just speculate on rumours. So many new users here today claiming everything from real rtm to fake rtm. Nobody is forcing you to run this, like I said in the other thread if you suspect foul play then provide some proof of dodgy traffic/logs from these leaked iso's untill then please don't accuse the uploaders of anything. Nobody is sure what is what until things get published on technet, which should be within 2 weeks, so be patient.
     
  5. itlvk

    itlvk MDL Member

    Jun 17, 2009
    106
    2
    10
    Build 7600 supply by china site only and don't supply by any other site, maybe fake. I Installed on VMWare only :D.
    I see build 7500 in china site, I find info this build but don't see.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  6. mspcbeta

    mspcbeta MDL Novice

    Jul 12, 2009
    40
    0
    0
    if it's fake,u need not to download it!:mad:
     
  7. PrEzi

    PrEzi MDL Addicted

    Aug 23, 2007
    534
    3
    30
    Hey mate, just ignore him and keep up the good work.
    There will always be some people like this one.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. smakked

    smakked MDL Novice

    Dec 30, 2008
    23
    0
    0
    Dunno if it is fake altho i dont thin it is the final either, i have just installed it on a a spare machine and cannot find any evidence of tampering.

    Proof please what files or eve a file with an old build date.
     
  9. itlvk

    itlvk MDL Member

    Jun 17, 2009
    106
    2
    10
    I downloaded some build but install on vmware for testing :p
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. lorca

    lorca MDL Novice

    Jan 22, 2008
    10
    2
    0
    If it is an earlier build then why can't I activate it with the earlier fixes for either earlier builds, RCs' or pre RTMs'. Are these guys so clever that they can spoof that also?

    I am not suggesting that this is the final RTM, but suggesting that this build had not been tampered or altered by some script kiddie
     
  11. VelleX

    VelleX MDL Member

    Jul 14, 2009
    203
    26
    10
    Maybe he is talking about the WIM2VHD.TXT file in the VHD builds:
    Generated by WIM2VHD7.WSF 6.1.7033.1.amd64fre.fbl_kernel_vm_dev(mikekol)

    But that has nothing to do with the Windows 7 version. Its just the WIM2VHD-script version.