Anyways, I don't think there's gonna be that much difference between 7264 and this 7265 (if it is real) ... but we'll see folks
Fake allright - look at the counter - with speed of 360 KB/s it should have shown (just some fast and rough estimation in the head) - around 2h 15m and not 1h 37m.
+1, exactly what I was thinking, that is closer to x64 file size, but clearly shows x86 in name, probably a fake
A problem with 7264? I tried to upgrade a virgin VISTA sp1 install using build 7264 and got the following error in setup: 0xc0000409 . This happened around the start of the last phase. Not sure since I have no way to trace the install process. This same build would not upgrade a clean working Vista that, presumably, would be what the VISTA users would be upgrading. That is what prompted the upgrade of a fresh vista-only-no-installed-programs system. All of the mentioned builds work well whem installed w/no upgrade, obviously on the same hardware. Any one else have this problem???