Windows 8 Pro Retail Box Hashes (SHA-1)

Discussion in 'Windows 8' started by Nzyme, Mar 25, 2013.

  1. Nzyme

    Nzyme MDL Novice

    Apr 18, 2012
    28
    3
    0
    #1 Nzyme, Mar 25, 2013
    Hi,

    Can anyone provide the SHA-1 values for Windows 8 Pro Retail boxed version (x86 and x64)?

    Note: I believe the SHA-1 value for MSDN version of Windows 8 is different from the retail boxed version.

    Thanks
     
  2. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #2 Tito, Mar 25, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013
    No, it should be same.
     
  3. BTOR

    BTOR MDL Addicted

    Nov 18, 2009
    574
    584
    30
    #3 BTOR, Mar 25, 2013
    is it urgent, as i have the dvd i did not think of making an iso, so first i should make a iso then get its hash. may be in few hours, once i reach home i can post it.
     
  4. Nzyme

    Nzyme MDL Novice

    Apr 18, 2012
    28
    3
    0
    #4 Nzyme, Mar 25, 2013 (OP)
    Not urgent, but please need this badly... Please share the SHA-1 value of the official retail DVD of Windows 8 Pro (atleast for x86 disc)?

    Really appreciate it!!!

    Thanks
     
  5. rrohela

    rrohela MDL Expert

    Sep 1, 2009
    1,610
    1,408
    60
    #5 rrohela, Mar 25, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013
    BTOR.. I think its useless to compute hash of ISO build manually as ISO build with difference of seconds will have different hashes

    @Nzyme
    There is no point calculating hashes of iso build from DVD. If you search forum then you will find that hashes of downloaded retail (ESD) were different for every one of same image(UK, USA or .....).

    Edit:- Check hashes of WIM file....
     
  6. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #6 Tito, Mar 25, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013
  7. rrohela

    rrohela MDL Expert

    Sep 1, 2009
    1,610
    1,408
    60
    #7 rrohela, Mar 25, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2013
    And which software i can use to test this?
     
  8. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #8 Tito, Mar 25, 2013
    Nero or UltraISO with 'Enable ISO Volume Filter' option checked.

    ;)
     
  9. rrohela

    rrohela MDL Expert

    Sep 1, 2009
    1,610
    1,408
    60
    #9 rrohela, Mar 25, 2013
    Alright... Checked and working, Even PowerISO does the same.... Nice learning:biggrin:..
     
  10. BTOR

    BTOR MDL Addicted

    Nov 18, 2009
    574
    584
    30
    #10 BTOR, Mar 25, 2013
  11. BTOR

    BTOR MDL Addicted

    Nov 18, 2009
    574
    584
    30
    #11 BTOR, Mar 26, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    HRM_CCSA_X86FRE_EN-GB_DV5.iso 2.38 GB

    Code:
    CRC32: 29CA56E8
MD5: 58C45B5983DE144236F0F61C14E39CC6
SHA-1: 7EAD7DA86426F554C41849B750BF29C74B9B3D5D
    HRM_CCSA_X64FRE_EN-GB_DV5.iso 3.26 GB

    Code:
    CRC32: 7797FD8F
MD5: 1C9D3FBCD725E79EF693059EA38F4447
SHA-1: 79ED9958CF1690DD8A60A0B1B15F5DCC76C8E625
    sorry for late reply
     
  12. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #12 Tito, Mar 26, 2013
    Same as MSDN.

    :g:
     
  13. BTOR

    BTOR MDL Addicted

    Nov 18, 2009
    574
    584
    30
    #13 BTOR, Mar 26, 2013
    never had en-GB iso so couldn't compare it earlier. anyways:worthy::worthy::worthy:
     
  14. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #14 Tito, Mar 26, 2013
    Sh!t happens ;)
     
  15. Nzyme

    Nzyme MDL Novice

    Apr 18, 2012
    28
    3
    0
    #15 Nzyme, Mar 27, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 20, 2017
    (OP)
    BTOR: Thanks for your efforts!

    However, if there is a 6 MB difference in data between the MSDN & retail version, then how can the SHA-1 be the same? I think that they packed in some updates in the retail discs.
     
  16. Tito

    Tito Super Mod / Adviser
    Staff Member

    Nov 30, 2009
    18,681
    18,589
    340
    #16 Tito, Mar 27, 2013
    He was confused with en-GB and en-US editions.