7600.16385 is coming!

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by mspcbeta, Jul 14, 2009.

  1. joey484

    joey484 MDL Novice

    Jul 13, 2009
    10
    0
    0
    #21 joey484, Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
  2. stimey

    stimey MDL Member

    Apr 21, 2008
    167
    5
    10
    Yeah all this speculation is pointless. Until its on technet with SHA-1 checksums we can't be sure what the RTM is. For now this one is running fine in virtual box and once the rtm details get published on technet we can verify f this was the rtm or not.
     
  3. wildky63

    wildky63 MDL Novice

    Jan 8, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    Warning - 16384 = Fake ... all 7600 release Fraud

    Win 7 7600.16384 = 100% fraud
    Windows 2008 R2 7600.16384 = 100% Fraud


    They are just changing build # & Claiming what M$ is doing. Lamer's are

    1.) using system & building Botnet
    2.) Lamer's Who want tobe & are nothing.

    4 times during the Beta release - Wzor released fake's changing builds & the Server also.


    Look in the latest : Server 2008 R2 7600.16384 in Windows dir: file : Wim2vhd.txt : the build matches 6.1.7033.1

    Wzor did the same thing 3 weeks ago with build: Win 7 build 7232 -


    anyone with these build can look in the Windows dir for that file. Build # mean nothing from Wzor.

    :mad:
     
  4. stimey

    stimey MDL Member

    Apr 21, 2008
    167
    5
    10
    #24 stimey, Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
    ^^^^^ Why don't you provide some proof on these botnet software inside the ISOs before accusing uploaders here? How about running it in virtual box or vmware and then sniff all traffic going to and from the vm with wireshark or something like that, then post some logs of things connecting out to dodgy servers, irc channels, etc, etc

    I doubt many people will download these builds and run them on a day to day basis. 1000 maybe? That is not much for a botnet nowadays, if anyone wants to build a botnet there's much easier ways to do so than going to the trouble to upload 3gb of data and changing builds numbers and even removing the timebomb of the rtm leak... Time to remove your tin foil hat.
     
  5. stasio

    stasio MDL Expert

    May 3, 2007
    1,193
    1,144
    60
    wildky63,
    don't spam arround this forum!
    The build is already check 1000x and nothing wrong.
    Your next post about this and you will be banned.:eek:
     
  6. stasio

    stasio MDL Expert

    May 3, 2007
    1,193
    1,144
    60
    We no need your comments:eek:
     
  7. wildky63

    wildky63 MDL Novice

    Jan 8, 2009
    4
    0
    0
    If you Read i did State Proof that release is False.

    if you also read you will see what i stated : reason
    1.) or 2.)

    I did not say there was or is 100% a rootkit. but to warn with so many ppl d/l this. i Do test release, I need no training from you on anything. Your comments are Way over the Top & you need to Read. I assist to Stop & Prevent Virus.
    If you don't like it Tuff.
     
  8. L.F.B.

    L.F.B. MDL Junior Member

    Dec 6, 2007
    65
    1
    0
    #28 L.F.B., Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
    Perhaps if you are from Microsoft crew... Wy don't you leak some real builds for us instead?

    otherwise you're just a stupid flamer...lol
     
  9. sutadpt

    sutadpt MDL Novice

    Mar 7, 2008
    33
    0
    0
  10. FABIGUI

    FABIGUI MDL Member

    Jun 2, 2007
    155
    0
    10
    How do I get a 64-bit copy of Windows 7

    "I am using one of the so-called “leaked” builds of Windows 7, how will I know if it is the real deal?
    As always, beware of what you download. There are many bogus copies of Windows 7 floating around the Internet. More often than not, they contain a rather nice malware payload. And don’t believe everything you read on the Internet. When Windows 7 hits RTM, it will be announced here. Until that happens, any builds you are likely to see on the web are either not the final bits or are laced with malicious code."


    !!SO I HAVE A WORM RUNNING BACKWARDS ON MY PC ?!!! :eek:
     
  11. PrEzi

    PrEzi MDL Addicted

    Aug 23, 2007
    534
    3
    30
    relax man, if you downloaded the 6.1.7600.16384 from a trusted source and the hash matches then you do not need to worry.
    wildkyy63 is spreading FUD without a proof. And his two 'reasons' are no reasons for me at all without an actual PROOF.
    I've scanned the whole damn extracted iso image without wildcards (all files)
    with like 5-6 AV scanners with latest virus databases and heuristics at max settings and nothing has been found on my build.

    Anyway - I'm still waiting till I install it on my PC for the real RTM deal.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  12. melodyice

    melodyice MDL Novice

    Jul 13, 2009
    3
    0
    0
    We want to use 16385
     
  13. brunobr

    brunobr MDL Novice

    Jul 14, 2009
    20
    2
    0
    PLease man!!!


    Upload x86 version EN US first!!!!


    :p
     
  14. HSChronic

    HSChronic MDL Expert

    Aug 25, 2007
    1,214
    64
    60
    #35 HSChronic, Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
    I am going to use 7600 until I get the money for a technet sub. This build is close enough to final for me. As long as it updates when they RTM then who cares.

    Edit
    You found me out, I am secretly leaking Windows builds and changing all the files with a hex editor so it looks like a new build. The purpose is to build a botnet that will steal people's personal info, then go online and order lots of peanut butter, powdered sugar, and chocolate and build me the worlds largest Reese's Peanut Butter Cup *evil laugh*. Now that you found me out though I will quickly make blog posts saying that this is the real RTM so my master plan will succeed.
     
  15. the Pl4gue

    the Pl4gue MDL Novice

    Jul 14, 2009
    2
    0
    0
    Can I have some of that peanut butter cup?
     
  16. ailef

    ailef MDL Senior Member

    Nov 30, 2007
    299
    16
    10
    #37 ailef, Jul 14, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2009
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  17. rasso

    rasso MDL Member

    May 24, 2009
    159
    0
    10
    why is microsoft leaking this builds ? microsft is stupid ? can anyone explain it to me
     
  18. sava700

    sava700 MDL Novice

    Jul 8, 2009
    17
    0
    0
    Why do people still want a 32bit OS?? 64bit is much better and soon to be the only thing available in the future. I don't know of many applications that don't work with 64bit Operating systems.
     
  19. Kromgol

    Kromgol MDL Junior Member

    Jul 12, 2009
    59
    0
    0
    All processors don't support x64