Why couldn't you before if I may ask you? The original leak was a bit dirty but should have worked without problems I think.
After reinstall 7989 with Stan's Undirty install.wim, I noticed the following benefits: 1. Installation is faster 2. No need to run sfc /scannow to get user tile working 3. No more "HP Computer" label on my none HP PC. 4. Faster restart and shut down time Thanks again Stan, I think everyone should use your install.wim for their 7989 installation instead of the "dirty" 7989 ISO, and I hope the Moderator would make this a sticky too...
sfc is fixed cause twinui.dll is not corrupted anymore by default. The installation is faster cause my wim is compressed with the maximum compression setting (which is also used by MS). The leak used fast. Maximum compression requires a bit more work from the cpu, but any cpu can decompress it faster than a dvd drive can read the disk. The install time for copying the files to the harddisk only depends on the read speed of the dvd, so a smaller wim means a faster install. It could well be that a usb install is a bit slower with max compression an a cpu which is a bit older. Faster reastart and shutdown? I don't know why this could be.
This is definitely worth the download. Great job. Better performance and User Account Picture works now!
As a little addition to the which-filehost-is-better debate, I can recommend ifile.it - no wait times, no speed restrictions, download acceleration/resuming support (even without registration), and long retention times (at least 300 days for files below 100MB, if uploaded by a registered user). They have no premium account feature, though.
Part 15 doesn't want to download at all, tried everything, first with jdownloader, then with Firefox, then with IE8, I have a premium account there and the only part I wasn't able to download is the part15
I hope the original poster can correct this, sometimes when Microsoft catch something like that which isn't approved (its not supposed to be leaked after all), they take pleasure of removing a link or preventing the download by asking the company to make it impossible to download a part but not reporting the link as down so people think there's a problem somewhere, its usually one of the last ones so you waste your precious bandwith with the first parts, I hope I won't have to redownload the whole package cause I'll have to wait till august for that.
Did you guys use firefox 5? I just tried it, no problem for me. Could that be something to do with your ISP?