abbodi1406's Batch Scripts Repo

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is the WHD-W7UI script able to integrate KB4537820 into a Windows Embedded POSReady 7 wim file? Or does the update itself still have the online-only restriction even though POSReady 7 still gets free updates?

 

Well that's a bummer. Thanks for telling me anyways.

 

I'm using WHDownloader and v6.4 of of Windows7 Updates Installer. I've always mounted a clean SP1 install.wim to a folder (D:/Mount) and then run WHD-W7UI.cmd (as Admin) to apply the updates. What I'd like to do is apply the ESU Bypass and integrate the Group-A ESU updates while omitting the superceded pre-ESU updates (Currently, only KB4534310, I believe).

1. Is this something that is planned for a future version of the WHD installer batch script?
   
   
2. Is there a simple way I could modify the WHD-W7UI.cmd and/or the Wim-Integration.cmd batch files or modify KB placements in the Updates folder to achieve what I'm looking to do?

EDIT: Somehow I missed the previous 2 messages, so no need to respond unless the response is different for NON-POSReady or there's something else I've overlooked.

 

Second post above yours:
https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/abbodi1406s-batch-scripts-repo.74197/page-53#post-1582371
You can integrate the bypass with the offline installer option of the bypass (wim-integration) and next dism /add-package the desired ESU updates.

 

Brother @abbodi1406 i think its possible for you to integerate bypassesu script 5 as kb4528069 suppress is already there & integerated via wim integeration method too into your whd w7ui without any issue after that script must install esu license check package ie : kb4538483 then install ssu package & KB4537829 & exit . i have tested it by my own & worked flawlessly today offered feb update rollup as well as march update rollup by WU too.

i tried it with WHD-W7UI but failed & when i tried it with WHD-W7UI_WithoutKB3125574 it succeded without any issue.

Just a request to you if it could be possible & i know nothing is impossible for you as you are a champ of scripting.

 

Thanks a lot lot brother

 

@abbodi1406

I used the MSMG Toolkit to integrate NetFX48 with W7 but it doesn't show the flag.

 

What exact pack did you integrate?

I am not aware that MSMG uses the WA's by @abbodi1406.

 

brother you have to use a correct thread for your query to OP .
please ask your query here on our community :

Code:

https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/msmg-toolkit.50572/

Thanks & Regards

 

@abbodi1406 brother is it possible to integerate Windows6.1-KB958559-x64-RefreshPkg to win7 with sp1 iso using WHD7UI ...
if its possible how to do.

Thanks & Regards

 

Hi Mate,

Sorry, I think I was not clear. I asked about the netfx package and not the MSMG Toolkit. Yesterday I received information that you are the creator of the repackaged netfx. (https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/msmg-toolkit.50572/page-722#post-1584056).

I think this thread is the best option. (covers the subject)

Thanks in advance.

Keep a low profile. Thanks.

 

MSMG has his own package, he recreated the pack by @abbodi1406 to be able to use it with MSMG toolkit.

When you have problems with using it, or have questions about it, better to ask @MSMG in the MSMG toolkit thread.

The Dotnetfx48 pack by @abbodi1406 shows this after integrating and windows is installed:

Spoiler

 

Hi mate,

NetFX4.8 (4.8.04115)

I understand everything you said.

Yesterday I posted on the "MSMG Toolkit" thread...

MSMG replied:
"The package is based on the abbodi1406 add-on, I just recreate it to be compatible with the MSMG Toolkit."

I posted here and abbodi1406 replied:
"I don't know how to integrate it, it is better to ask in the MSMG Toolkit topic".

Those with advanced knowledge to help have that attitude.

I'm creating an x86/x64 iso with many updates and modifications using the "MSMG Toolkit". I cannot install a package without knowing if it is working correctly I would lose hours of work.

I'll to use the NetFX472 package because I have already tested it and I know it is working 100%.

Thank you anyways

 

@abbodi1406 always goes to great lengths to help people, so i don't know about what attitude you are talking about.

He suggests, like i (and @Disk2019 too) tried to explain, to ask questions about MSMG stuff in the correct thread, @MSMG doesn't use his pack as it's made by @abbodi1406, he made his own pack, based on @abbodi1406 his pack, and created his own method of integration so only @MSMG can answer the questions about it.

And still you go on about it in the wrong thread.