[ARCHIVED] Windows Editions Reconstruction Project

Discussion in 'Windows 10' started by whatever127, Jan 10, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    --delta-from=
    &
    -delta-from=
     
  2. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7322 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    Could it be:
    Code:
    wimlib-imagex append F:\ ..\pro.esd --delta-from=".\UUPs\*.esd" --solid --threads=2
    
     
  3. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
  4. gailium119

    gailium119 MDL Addicted

    Oct 12, 2021
    790
    510
    30
    I used it first.It appearently didn't went well.
     
  5. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7325 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    Keep going. Don't give up easily.

    You mistook its usage? (Probably.)

    Maybe those files (cab\esd) can be expanded to a folder and captured into one wim\esd? (alike Unstaged "Packages")

    Yes, your script has "Packages", capture it to Packages.esd. Then export\apply --ref=".\Packages.esd"

    You can use it as custom image. Because official UUP is in-place. No need to bother.
     
  6. gailium119

    gailium119 MDL Addicted

    Oct 12, 2021
    790
    510
    30
    Idea: Maybe I can reference the official uup install.wim to unstaged.Then it will be much smaller.
     
  7. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7327 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    OK. Give it a go and see if you have time.
     
  8. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7328 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    17763 does not use new Update Technology like builds from 18362.1 forward.

    Q: Does 17763 use PSFX updates as 18362?
    A: Yes.
     
  9. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    Q: Is microsoft-windows-editionpack-professional-package.esd necessary when there is microsoft-windows-editionpack-ppipro-package.esd?

    e.g. 19041.1 microsoft-windows-editionpack-ppipro-package.esd
    Code:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
    <assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3" manifestVersion="1.0" copyright="Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.">
      <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-PPIPro-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
      <package identifier="Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-PPIPro" releaseType="Feature Pack">
        <update name="c1dff5c5a42a27a5461e2fd497da80c9">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Client-Features-PPI-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="bf41d538080fad23e6a094f15f3e50d9">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Team-DevTools-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="858bf352242f5637a24a7da4a6efcea9">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-Professional-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="2d4b1be9c3f73d14c530b7ce6faad8fe">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-PPI-Hardware-Bantry-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="7ca0f0ddeb2846a147a763155a64bf55">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-PPI-SystemApps-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="0c938e8814896bb6f4e1c33cf3ba554d">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-Required-ShellExperiences-PPI-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
        <update name="0ae0ee634ca73bda73da7736acd42092">
          <package contained="false" integrate="hidden">
            <assemblyIdentity name="Microsoft-Windows-Shell-PPI-Group-Package" version="10.0.19041.1" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="neutral" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" />
          </package>
        </update>
      </package>
    </assembly>
    
    Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-Professional-Package

    A: No.
     
  10. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7330 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    Well, I use 19041.1 Professional_xx-xx.esd and the install.wim (3,573 MB) it creates to export index 3, the oucome is a wim of 2,303 MB without winre.wim.

    Dism does not know it. Then, with Dism++, I apply it to a partition, and it installs and updates. It hangs at "rebooting".

    Now, both System and Store, up to date and working fine.
     
  11. gailium119

    gailium119 MDL Addicted

    Oct 12, 2021
    790
    510
    30
    Do you know what's missing?
     
  12. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    #7332 xinso, Mar 31, 2022
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2022
    Oh, I don't know. Check it yourself.
     
  13. Nack11

    Nack11 MDL Member

    Oct 30, 2021
    152
    21
    10
    ... whatever
     
  14. Nack11

    Nack11 MDL Member

    Oct 30, 2021
    152
    21
    10
    i know i like that, but i am have interested to see the professional 20348 in my VM
     
  15. Nack11

    Nack11 MDL Member

    Oct 30, 2021
    152
    21
    10
    if you can
     
  16. xinso

    xinso MDL Guru

    Mar 5, 2009
    13,702
    14,431
    340
    I don't. Try gailium119.
     
  17. Nack11

    Nack11 MDL Member

    Oct 30, 2021
    152
    21
    10
    ok, i will try
     
  18. gailium119

    gailium119 MDL Addicted

    Oct 12, 2021
    790
    510
    30
    @xinso Do you have 22000.1 enterpriseS edition files?
     
  19. gailium119

    gailium119 MDL Addicted

    Oct 12, 2021
    790
    510
    30