Build 7989 x64 Questions and Findings

Discussion in 'Windows 8' started by win8test, Jun 18, 2011.

  1. FaiKee

    FaiKee Misinformation spreader

    Jul 24, 2009
    4,303
    5,816
    150
  2. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    Windows Experience Index in 7989

    Can you explain why Windows Experience Index in 7989 Decreases ?
    take a look:
    7955
    7955.jpg
    7989
    7989.jpg
    But in fact, 7989 run faster than 7955 :confused:
     
  3. chbaldo

    chbaldo MDL Senior Member

    Jan 29, 2011
    251
    124
    10
    Maybe is the architecture, I don't know really.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. Mrx47

    Mrx47 MDL Addicted

    Apr 6, 2011
    571
    90
    30
    Yes, maybe it is because build 7955 is x86 and 7989 is x64.
     
  5. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    #526 zflexible, Jun 22, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2011
    or because I have only 2 GB of RAM ? :eek:
    then why the processor Subscore decreases too ?
     
  6. ReelFiles

    ReelFiles MDL Addicted

    Mar 30, 2011
    500
    131
    30
    My Thinkpad Edge's graphics score went from 4.3 in 7601, down to 3.9 in 7989. It's probably just because it doesn't have win 8 optimized drivers.
     
  7. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    But in fact, 7989 run faster than 7601, and your graphics too :eek:
     
  8. siggy2xc

    siggy2xc MDL Novice

    Jun 20, 2011
    11
    1
    0
    You can see the paypal tile saying that it is called "Omnimo" if you google that you find that it is a skin for rainmeter.
     
  9. ReelFiles

    ReelFiles MDL Addicted

    Mar 30, 2011
    500
    131
    30
    I don't know about that, seems a bit slower booting up and restarting. About the same during regular use, but the killer is every time I hit the HDD with reads or writes it lags for a few milliseconds. If I start multitasking quickly like opening it bunch of tabs, while using flash etc it becomes noticeable. I also think those are driver issues since it didn't seem to lag as much in older win 8 builds. This laptop has an i5-520M, 4GB of RAM and a 7,200 RPM HDD, so it ain't that. Not that I am complaining, this is to be expected from non-optimized drivers and software. Hell ain't that what beta testing is all about?

    :shisha:
     
  10. ODY123

    ODY123 MDL Expert

    Apr 20, 2011
    1,164
    181
    60
    #531 ODY123, Jun 22, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2011
    That's why is better to run x86 than x64 if you have a choice, a lot more drivers and newer drivers in x86 than x64...
     
  11. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    "I also think those are driver issues since it didn't seem to lag as much in older win 8 builds"

    do not use the installer, decompress the installer ( use "7-zip") and use driver update+browse my computer+let me pick from+have disk+browse and select your driver .inf file and update :D
     
  12. burfadel

    burfadel MDL EXE>MSP/CAB

    Aug 19, 2009
    2,626
    3,856
    90
    Microsoft could have readjusted the way it rates performance too. Not sure what the highest number will be when Win 8 is released, but since that won't be until the end of next year, and seeing that there is the Ivy Bridge, LGA2011 Sandy-Bridges, AMD Bulldozer, even possibly 2nd gen AMD Bulldozer and the new AMD socket 2012 (nothing to do with the pin count, just a name meaning 2012 release, replaces G32...)

    Basically by then they need to factor in AVX (not factored in with Window 7, and only available post SP1), FMA4 (AMD Bulldozer), FMA3 (Ivy Bridge), XOP (AMD BD), etc. as well as the next gen GPU's, such as the HD7000 Radeons, being built on a completely new architecture allowing for easier OpenCL etc use, new Nvidia architecture, new gen SSD's, and the likelihood that we need SATA4 next year seeing SATA3 is almost maxed out on the fastest SSD's (only when in AHCI mode) etc, faster RAM...

    Out of 14? lol

    Wonder if they'll add new things on there like OpenCL/Directcompute performance etc?
     
  13. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    Thank You for this informations :)
     
  14. FaiKee

    FaiKee Misinformation spreader

    Jul 24, 2009
    4,303
    5,816
    150
    That's what I thought too.but I didn't notice the paypal tile. :p
     
  15. suddo30

    suddo30 MDL Novice

    May 1, 2011
    11
    1
    0
    I have the same issue

    (different between windows 7 & 7989)

    7601.jpg

    7989.jpg
     
  16. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    #537 zflexible, Jun 22, 2011
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2011
    Can you post your spec?
    my spec:
    Processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T3200 @ 2.00GHz
    Memory (RAM) 2,00 GB
     
  17. suddo30

    suddo30 MDL Novice

    May 1, 2011
    11
    1
    0
    my laptop spec:
    Processor core i5 M460 @2.53GHZ
    Memory (RAM) 6,00 GB
    Grafik: ATI (Mobile) HD 5730
     
  18. zflexible

    zflexible MDL Member

    Jun 21, 2011
    138
    16
    10
    :eek: then what's going on?
     
  19. suddo30

    suddo30 MDL Novice

    May 1, 2011
    11
    1
    0
    in 7989 both CPU have same index: 4.9