He said he ran offline-installer, but the image shows he ran online-installer Anyway I was trying to help him figure out if original KB was installed to point in the right direction.
Yes exactly, he obviously meant online and he made a mistake by writing offline. He does not have any problem except that he's wondering why the kb4528069 does not show in the installed updates list. It seems that installing kb4528069 lite package results in the hiding of this update in the installed updates list. It can't be visible in the list. You have mentionned this yourself in this post => https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...pdates-eligibility.80606/page-78#post-1579099
Let me clear something up first. The point is, if original KB4528069 is already installed, you cannot install Lite version over it, and you get the same message in the image he posted (e.g. Update KB4528069 is already installed.) Based on that message, I assumed he already had original KB installed, and that he wanted to install Lite version over the original KB, which he can't do because you must uninstall original KB before installing Lite version. He said he tried searching for the original KB, which he couldn't find, so I was trying to help him find original KB (so he could uninstall it) because I know that Win7 'search installed updates function' can be a bit buggy. Again, this is all under the assumption that he has original KB already installed, which is exactly what the message says in the image he posted.
I didn't say that installing the lite version hid anything, i said this: The search function i mentioned works fine, enter kbxxxxxxx and it will search for it and show if it is present in the list. I can tell you both that all this misinformation can f**k up someones install for real.
Holy sh**, Thanks. Is that mentioned somewhere here, and I missed it? So I will get all 40 of them from askwoody, or is there a cúmulative update download for all of them somewhere?
It's in Simplix dedicated thread https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...egrate-hotfixes-into-win7-distribution.45005/ no, nothing i'm aware of
Yes i thought about that too, but then how can we explain that the update is not visible if we go by this hypothese. Based on the message he received, nothing happens when trying to install the lite version, though we need to fo a test to see what will happen if someone tries to install the lite version after that the original update had been installed. Another hypothese we should consider is that he installed the lite package without the original update being installed and he tried to execute the bat file of the lite version a second time. All this needs to be tested so we can clarify this once for all.
I Have 3 windows 7s. In case I installed the bypass on any I went through all of them and took it out. I agree Lite is the best. SSU is best to get first. I agree. Installing in no order Saved the updates on a spare drive. Someone may want. There was 4 right?