A fresh dism would be sufficient or there is something else? I've not used MSMG for a while but it comes with a bin folder with updated dism and used to work until the last time I used it. Could it be a viable option for you as well?
No, I don't think so. I was asking about the download and update process by Uupdump scripts. They do this one after the other. Here is what the site says about the matter:
Yet another reason to keep a computer around with a fairly recent version of Windows. Sometimes nothing else will get the job done. Doesn't matter how much you dislike Microsoft, or how much you love Windows 7 (or whatever), sometimes you just need a recent version of Windows.
Thanks, good to know. (and better if @MSMG is informed as well) BTW MS should provide explicit warnings on those changes, (instead of focusing informing US that a popup changed theme) They already provided enough headhaches changing sliently the on disk format of deduped files starting with 15063. Something that AFAIK is totally undocummented.
No thanks, I'm now happily retired. I did interview with Microsoft back around 1985, for a position writing device drivers. I wound up turning down their offer, for a number of reasons, mostly personal and involving my not wanting to relocate. In hindsight, I should have taken the offer. Back then, they were hiring as employees, not contract, and that included stock options which would most likely have made me rich. Oh, well.
WOW ; Someone else also has very similar "thoughts" @ Interview with MS may back-in 1980>"didn't want to relocate to NM from Boston".<....LOL Yip my than college roommate got me this 'interview" (he was working for MS by then) and he never told me about his incentive "$50" bonus if I stated with MS.....and YES he daily reminded me while flying around the world from BG's Private Lear Jet..... Ah; thought lost "MS shares @ 0.83cents" ; would surely come handy now in my retirement.... Sorry I digress from topic here lol
@luzea , I noticed the new site copy prompt, but I didn't find the corresponding localized content in the language file where the site is hosted. When site add the corresponding localized of the new site copy prompt?
I'm not the one who added the warning, but as the commit message says, it's just a temporary change and not meant to be permanent.
I want to create an ISO for Windows 10 Pro (x64) version 22H2 (build number 19045.2006). I see these two on the UUPDUMP website: (1) Feature update to Windows 10, version 22H2 (19045.2006) amd64 (2) Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 22H2 (19045.2006) amd64 Which of the two must I use? Is there any difference between the ISOs created using either of the options? Is checking "Include Updates (Windows Converter only)" required for both of the options?
choose Feature update + select Include Updates checkbox "Cumulative update" versions don't include dynamic update for Sources folder (useful for upgrades from ISO) and don't have apps for Windows 11, always avoid it if you can without "Include Updates" option you'll get base 19041.1 build
Code: .\files\depends_win.ps1 : The term '.\files\depends_win.ps1' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script file, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and try again. At line:1 char:1 + .\files\depends_win.ps1 -ForDownload + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (.\files\depends_win.ps1:String) [], CommandNotFoundException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException Press any key to continue . . . ???
If you use the first option "Download only", the package is missing .\files\depends_win.ps1. As a workoround, download the converter pack (option 2 or 3) and copy the file over.