[DISCUSSION] Windows 10 1903/9 'FINAL' Build 18362/3.xxx (PC) [19H1/2 Release]

If i want to use install.esd instead of install.wim so i can install Windows using FAT32 with UEFI, can i download the .ISO from Techbench and replace install.wim with install.esd? Is this enough?

 

for some reason the AMD Threadripper runs a lot faster on this build Pro x64 v1903. The only bad thing is Windows installs the default sound drives that harsh on the ears.

 

Did I say anything about choosing the installation media platform i.e. USB or DVD here? No.

I said, to reduce the size of the MS published ISO, it's better to make my own ISO via ESD which only content your/anyone's prefered version(s) & thus, the size 'd be smaller. & yes, I know what you've said & been using USB TD as an installation media since 2009, Windows 7 days.

 

3.88 Gb actually

 

Well, precisely. I said 3.8 GB earlier.

 

18362.30 Official MVS Consumer & Business ISOs = Suspended

What was the reason?

Also does anybody know if this is eventually be full released to VL any time soon?

 

Yep, that's ok.

 

A persistent problem with the Calendar app.
Every three days, the live tile in the Start menu is no longer updated.
I have to run the Calendar so that the tile is updated.
Has anyone encountered a similar problem and how to solve it?

 

I' wondering about the goodies offered by 1903 vs 1809. Sandbox is an interresting feature but only seems to work with US/GB OS languages. MS is aware of the issue since many months but no correction is available.

 

Guys the windows 10 RS5 key i used to activate RS5 , will the same MAK key work if i install 19H1 as a fresh install rather then as an upgrade to RS5?

 

MAK= Multiple Activation Key if it is genuine and not a stolen one it should

 

You have ask about this before, fresh install using your mak key depends if any activation left so if there is you can do fresh install, have you make backup of your activation like we other do there is no problem with fresh install and then recover your activation.

 

-snip-

 

I don't think it's about language. It's about SLAT support, if your computer support it. Mine is not so I can't install it.

 

hmmm for example enterprise 1903 amd64 with feature update 18362.145 with three additional updates (215MB) -> 3.15GB, nothing ripped

 

here also continues without running the sandbox, even after so many updates .. disregard of microsoft with this tool that she both announced

 

My system supports SLT...

 

You get error about Sandbox ?

 

End of June Microsoft wants to fix the bug with the Sandbox.

 

Well, I said the size 'd be 3.8 GB for 18362.30 only without anything integrated. It's obvious that the size will increase gradually when/if you add any other packages (CU/SSU/FLASH etc)