1. cuteee

    cuteee MDL Guru

    Oct 13, 2012
    5,730
    982
    180
    @Enthousiast, what the "feature update to windows 10" include ?
     
  2. bogol

    bogol MDL Junior Member

    Dec 30, 2009
    58
    56
    0
    Is it ok to delete these folders in "C:/Windows/Servicing/LCU" ?
    These seem to be some old CUs (apart from the latest one of course), taking about 2.2Gb of space (127.000 files)
    These are not cleaned when using system files cleanup.

    I tried on a VM and it seemed ok (and doing an in-place upgrade worked fine after cleaning these folders), but I prefer asking here just in case :)
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,274
    94,763
    450
    Afaik, should be safe to delete but that's the pool where windows looks for when a reinstall of the cu is needed, when deleted, it will get redownloaded when needed.
     
  4. deadock

    deadock MDL Junior Member

    Jan 11, 2016
    71
    29
    0
    My guess is that the updated CPU scheduler is for Ryzen 3000 CPU. I Also noticed some improvements with 19h2 (since 10013) on my r5 3600 compared to 1903.
     
  5. bogol

    bogol MDL Junior Member

    Dec 30, 2009
    58
    56
    0
  6. ch100

    ch100 MDL Addicted

    Sep 11, 2016
    829
    694
    30
    Then maybe the recommendation would be to disable the servicing task, at least until Microsoft decides to fix its own cleanup mess. :)
     
  7. bonesz

    bonesz MDL Addicted

    Jun 30, 2013
    634
    354
    30
    That is the 1st thing I did once this issue became known and went unfixed. I continue to install newest CU's as they are released to the RP ring and I just don't run dism cleanup/resetbase and leave the servicing task disabled.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  8. EaglePC

    EaglePC MDL Expert

    Feb 13, 2012
    1,147
    471
    60
    i9-9940X seems the cores start at 0 running applications instead of using 2 cores 4 and 7 on previous windows
     
  9. endbase

    endbase MDL Guru

    Aug 12, 2012
    4,673
    1,710
    150
    Dunno man check for yourself ?
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,274
    94,763
    450
    It's just a cosmetic thing, we all have it when on 18363.xxx.
     
  11. TShadow

    TShadow MDL Junior Member

    May 21, 2007
    84
    33
    0
    idem, that's what I always did, also never did use Dism for a cleanup/resetbase, and until now never had a problem with CU's on all my installations.
     
  12. ch100

    ch100 MDL Addicted

    Sep 11, 2016
    829
    694
    30
    @bonesz @TShadow I think there is something missing here. I have never brought into this discussion the /resetbase switch.
    The issue which was introduced with 1809 I think and is certainly observed in 1903 is that the /startcomponentcleanup without /resetbase behaves like the /resetbase is configured.
    The servicing task does not have the /resetbase flag, but would likely behave the same in the recent versions of Windows 10.
    Regardless, thanks for replying and confirming that servicing task was disabled on your systems.
     
  13. abbodi1406

    abbodi1406 MDL KB0000001

    Feb 19, 2011
    16,219
    84,895
    340
    1809 don't have the issue (aside from some PSFX delta issues on non en-us systems, but was very limited)

    1903 have one change (considered as issue) and another issue

    the issue is, running full resetbase breaks CUs installation completely

    the change is, CU are direct updates to system packages, which lead to superseding RTM packages
    thus, when running any cleanup, it simply uninstall any superseded updates (in this case the updates are RTM system packages), and as result any RTM components associated with the removed packages are removed as well

    this change is not issue itself, but the way they build some release preview CU leads to issue
    they add some new components to CU, then in later CU they remove them, which break the consistency and lead to missing components issue
     
  14. Hasefroch

    Hasefroch MDL Senior Member

    Dec 24, 2018
    283
    170
    10
    I am using 19H2 build 18362.10019 from ISO built from UUP Dump and it installed and updated flawlessly with no errors. This thing don't appear. I'm using es-MX language (perhaps that is the reason)
     
  15. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    47,274
    94,763
    450
    18362.10019 is not 18363.xxx ;)
     
  16. Master01

    Master01 MDL Novice

    Mar 18, 2015
    49
    25
    0
    Now 18363 is just RP little test update, real 1909 is 18362.10019... for now...
    Soon MS merge Slow ring and RP and 18363 will be fully 1909. Now 18363 is just 1903 with bump delta update.
     
  17. mokoko

    mokoko MDL Member

    Nov 6, 2012
    108
    56
    10
    #4939 mokoko, Sep 9, 2019
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2019
    So, we won't get anything for 1909 on September 10 as guessed before... October is the date it seems.

    Hopefully, we will get a fix for cortana on 1903.
     
  18. Borgin

    Borgin MDL Junior Member

    Apr 15, 2018
    84
    4
    0
    Can using HWID activation and then binding it to an MS account cause that MS account to get locked for terms of service?
    Has anyone seen this?