[DISCUSSION] Windows 10 1903/9 'FINAL' Build 18362/3.xxx (PC) [19H1/2 Release]

Archive it and put it on Drive. I'm unsure about the piracy stuff, my Windows 10 is activated legitimately. I didn't know Ten Forums were so stuck up. If you used KMS or something, you could temporarily uninstall so it doesn't show? I dunno. You can make a separate topic here and tag me so I get a notification, but BleepingComputer would likely have people that are way more skilled than I am at this.

 

Thanks.

EDIT: I've not been having the BSODs.

 

any news about the rtm finalization of 20h1 aka 2004 in late dec?

 

It's 19H2 aka 1909 thread.

 

The only evidence is no Build Number greater than 19041.1 has shown up since 19041.1 was released on 11 Dec.

 

ok, what about 19536 that released on 16th Dec? Is that from 20H2 branch?
Also, in 19041.1 build, does it have the insider watermark & the expiry date? And upon a fresh/clean installation, insider programmes are running or not?

 

Why don't you ask these questions in the relevant threads?

 

Did MS ever fix NVidia DPC driver latency issue in this build?

 

any link to windows 1903 18362.207 iso may update ??

 

Do we have a in-house solution for HDIW?

 

I can't disable Top Header in Settings with mach2, with this command :

Code:

mach2 disable 18299130

 

HWID and other than the upgrade path from 7,8,8.1... not in house but google can show you the way or as it can't be discussed openly on the forums, you can PM someone about it.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

Thanks I already knew about it, thought maybe someone here picked up where s1ave77 left.

 

thank you.

the tool just 'says': "Specified key is not valid"

anyway, regardless of my PK, are there known ways, beyond "slui 4", to at least make phone activation wizard show up, or maybe having tried a non legit key might have removed any chances to even just display that ui item ?
(or maybe it does not show up for reasons not related to the PK i tried to use ?)

 

His program still works flawlessly, FYI.