Page 399 of 410
  1. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7961 Enthousiast, Sep 17, 2020 (OP)
  2. sucro

    sucro MDL Novice

    Nov 9, 2014
    3
    0
    0
    #7962 sucro, Sep 17, 2020
  3. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7963 Enthousiast, Sep 17, 2020 (OP)
    2004 is not 1903/9. This is the 1903/9 thread.
     
  4. anansay

    anansay MDL Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2020
    254
    97
    10
    #7964 anansay, Sep 17, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2020
    I am saving them to my local drive.
     
  5. anansay

    anansay MDL Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2020
    254
    97
    10
    #7965 anansay, Sep 17, 2020
    The title of the thread "[DISCUSSION] Windows 10 Final Build 19041/2.1/208/264/329/388/450 (PC) [20H1/2 vb_release]" is confusing. Its naming is inconsistent with other titles dealing with other editions/versions of Microsoft Windows.

    To recall:

    [DISCUSSION] Windows 10 1903/9 'FINAL' Build 18362/3.xxx (PC) [19H1/2 Release]

    [INFO - DISCUSSION + Downloads] Windows 10 1809 FINAL b 17763.xxx (PC) [RS5]

    Hence I propose that the web admin change the title to [DISCUSSION] Windows 10 2004 Final Build 19041/2.1/208/264/329/388/450 (PC) [20H1/2 vb_release]
     
  6. SAM-R

    SAM-R MDL Guru

    Mar 21, 2015
    5,914
    5,753
    180
    #7966 SAM-R, Sep 17, 2020
    20H2 is not yet Final (19042)
     
  7. anansay

    anansay MDL Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2020
    254
    97
    10
    #7967 anansay, Sep 18, 2020
    That is a different subject.

    By the way, since you mentioned it, the title [DISCUSSION] Windows 10 Final Build 19041/2.1/208/264/329/388/450 (PC) [20H1/2 vb_release] should be amended to

    [DISCUSSION] Windows 10 2004 Final Build 19041.1/208/264/329/388/450 (PC) [20H1 vb_release] by adding 2004 before the word Final and dropping /2 that is after 19041 and 20H1.

    I was confused too because I thought 19042 is final.
     
  8. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7968 Enthousiast, Sep 18, 2020 (OP)
    There will always be newbe's who will be confused (mostly because of not reading) with 4.000.000 views in total. Thread titles are how they are because of the circumstances of the time of creation.
     
  9. anansay

    anansay MDL Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2020
    254
    97
    10
    #7969 anansay, Sep 18, 2020
    But we can make the forums and sub-forums more user-friendly, right?

    Besides, I advocate consistency in naming threads. Only the following thread does not follow the other two's naming convention: [DISCUSSION] Windows 10 Final Build 19041/2.1/208/264/329/388/450 (PC) [20H1/2 vb_release]

    In addition @SAM-R mentioned that build 19042 is not even final.
     
  10. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7970 Enthousiast, Sep 18, 2020 (OP)
    Only the 20H2 EP is still IP, all other updates are public, the same with 1903 > 1909 when it first was released. And now it won't even be that long till the 20H2 EP will be publically available too.

    The currently available 19042.450 ISOs are labelled IP, all others aren't.

    There are just 3 sticky build threads, the OPs are well maintained (says the fool himself), so all will be clear when they are read.

    ps, you might think that MDL is centrally controlled but it's just a bunch of members creating the threads and content voluntarily, at their own merit.
     
  11. anansay

    anansay MDL Senior Member

    Jul 13, 2020
    254
    97
    10
    #7971 anansay, Sep 18, 2020
    It's not centrally managed? I was told that Yen was the one who managed this website?
     
  12. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7972 Enthousiast, Sep 18, 2020 (OP)
    There is staff, content is mostly by normal members.
     
  13. SAM-R

    SAM-R MDL Guru

    Mar 21, 2015
    5,914
    5,753
    180
    #7973 SAM-R, Sep 18, 2020
  14. LostED

    LostED SVF Patch Lover

    Jul 30, 2009
    7,184
    21,304
    240
    #7974 LostED, Sep 19, 2020
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2020
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  15. ashish1989

    ashish1989 MDL Addicted

    Sep 20, 2013
    502
    97
    30
    #7975 ashish1989, Sep 25, 2020
  16. Enthousiast

    Enthousiast MDL Tester

    Oct 30, 2009
    49,647
    103,310
    450
    #7976 Enthousiast, Oct 13, 2020 (OP)
  17. ipx

    ipx MDL Addicted

    May 24, 2017
    774
    738
    30
    #7977 ipx, Oct 19, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2022
    .
     
  18. ipx

    ipx MDL Addicted

    May 24, 2017
    774
    738
    30
    #7978 ipx, Oct 19, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2022
    .
     
  19. Deleted member 841150

    Deleted member 841150 Guest

    #7979 Deleted member 841150, Oct 20, 2020
    I have a question. I run 1909 and 2009 on VM and on both versions I have disabled Windows update services. I've noticed the settings header got updated. How?
     
  20. Deleted member 1254778

    Deleted member 1254778 Guest

    #7980 Deleted member 1254778, Oct 20, 2020
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 20, 2020
    it was already integrated in your system, now it got enabled by MS (this process is in no way related to Windows Update services, so they were not „updated“, as you said)
     
Page 399 of 410