Using x64 adds much more complexity to the system file hierarchy-wise, which in-turn uses more disk space, and (from what I heard) 32-bit apps end up running in a compatibility layer. If you have no need for x64 software nor the OS, x86 is a better choice. Such scenarios however are probably pretty rare nowadays though. I have a HP DC5750 with 3GB of RAM and a x64 CPU. I only use 32-bit operating systems on it due to it's usage (it only runs a single game, which only comes in 32-bit), even though it has a x64 processor. On Windows, the architecture I use for this program doesn't particularly matter, but on Linux, using x64 makes getting that game running significantly more difficult since it isn't a x64 app (go from needing 1 dependency on x86 to over 20 with x64 (since the x64 Linux distro itself doesn't come with a bunch of 32-bit installed), with no benefit).
I've got this: Windows PowerShell Copyright (C) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. PS C:\Users\gadel> Get-AppXPackage -AllUsers | Foreach {Add-AppxPackage -DisableDevelopmentMode -Register “$($_.InstallLocation)\AppXManifest.xml”} Get-AppXPackage : Access is denied. Access is denied. At line:1 char:1 + Get-AppXPackage -AllUsers | Foreach {Add-AppxPackage -DisableDevelopm ... + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: ) [Get-AppxPackage], UnauthorizedAccessException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.UnauthorizedAccessException,Microsoft.Windows.Appx.PackageManager.Commands.GetApp xPackageCommand PS C:\Users\gadel> I ran as Admin, of course Edit2: Nope, I did not, now it's doing things, let me see... Edit3: It's still there "Add-AppxPackage : Deployment failed with HRESULT: 0x80073D06, The package could not be installed because a higher version of this package is already installed." etc.
I too get the freezes and IE crashes but so far WiFi is good. I figure the freezing must be a driver issue but I can't figure out which one. The processor is never running high and memory is staying low as well yet at times it just freezes solid for a minute or two.
I still don't understand the wifi error that 10159 is causing on my laptop, how it sees the factory card, a Qualcomm, as a Realtek is beyond me. If it stays like that in any future builds, I will not be staying with Windows 10.
same over here, realtek 887 chip, having to use vm cause of hardware problems on near rtm and before could use real mode, this is not good news for MS at this level
I'll probably stick with the Insider program too. On the one hand though, I wonder how often MS will be releasing new builds, or maybe they'll just stick to plain updates? I prefer to do clean installs when dealing with new builds, but it would get annoying for me pretty quickly if it's a somewhat daily thing like 10158 to 10159 lol (weekly+ may not be too bad). So far, my main issues come from software compatibility with a few things. Diablo II and WoW both have no audio (pretty sure it's a Realtek thing). MSI Afterburner (RTSS more specifically) also doesn't seem to hook into games all the time, but this needs re-verified. Perhaps when/if the Xbox app gets more Game DVR settings (and maybe an exclusive fullscreen hook method, although I doubt this will happen), I can ditch Afterburner. On an unrelated note, I like the Hero wallpaper, but would kind of like it more if it had a bit more emphasis on black with blue shining on it (right now it's all blue). So you see the Windows logo shining-through black basically. I think it would also match the default non-colored start/task bar much better. (goes and posts this to the actual feedback app now )
Has nothing to do with MS, they don't make drivers..they just add the s**t the vendors send them..that's who you have your beef with.
unless the are WHQL drivers, then the vendors send MS the drivers for WHQL approval. If approved MS will give them the OKieDOkie and can be used in WU. My general rule of thumb is to get drivers from the manufacturers though. For me, the majority of the time the drivers from WU are not as good as the ones from the vendors, if for no other reason than the Vendors can add and do things with the drivers that they cant do with WHQL.
that code was to install the package,wasn't it? it was the icon for old store that is leftover,he was trying to remove it.
If M$oft change lines of codes as they patchup the tp before rtm it may cause compatibility problems with any drivers. As mentioned M$oft provide the OS hw manufacturers have to send it to be wrhql and the spinning wheel turn and turn loll