dont think its offend someone cos the topic still soon-dl not yet rtm ltsc but i duno if it really can be called LTSC-like if ever cos its different packages, might miss some of the features that real one going to be thx for sharing, tho
mums and manifest change the settings of each features and packages if feature it missed so it wont change it if feature was added in RS5 it wont set to be ltsc as the real one, cos RS1 didnt had it and more other internal settings that was added in RS5 and wasnt include in RS1 but seeing it removing the metro apps is nice and it can be right as u say but im looking for stability as ms intended so if not stable i can know its ms fault and not the build made cos windows lately is not stable with metros, so removing manually them can be done not sure how much it wont de-stable the system, LTSC RTM or LTSC with same ver packages can be fit to this but it can be working as well, just dont want to be hassle with too many variables impacting, ms already doing great work there seeing too much windows breaking in metro infa, it will be better fmo to have more insurance edit: but im wondering if it will be better then ltsc packages less Dragonic polices, worth checking
No more "Windows License valid for 90 days" etc.Watermark on Evaluation edition by modifying C:\Windows\System32\xx-XX\shell32.dll.mui.
Could be, im cant really oppose what u saying, i saw just one file related to enterpriseS which is xml, didnt saw another file relate to enterpriseS so i cant say its included / build-in to image like the other editions its new area for me, really just opinion plays here i saw u were be able to convert client 32bit to server it was quite legit the settings was changed to server, like password complex etc... if the process counts and handles and the process tree is same as server 2019 can be quite LTSC-like fmo also the packages, in server is differnt then normal windows client [non-ltsc] so thats can be also point to discredit it
was able to remove it by unhide the package even its solid merged to parent package ? or found another way or manual removing ?
I use your Optimize-Offline GitHub tool to "debloat" my LTSB 2016 images (you guys should check it out!). Optimize-Offline makes a custom 'light' image using the official ISO (removes Defender, telemetry, biometric and interactive components). I've put together a LTSB 2016 version of the Optimize-Offline script if anyone is interested (not officially supported by GodHand's GitHub tool). GodHand's Optimize-Offline tool officially supports "builds RS3+." When LTSC 2019 gets properly released, I can highly recommend this GitHub hosted tool to further "debloat" it. (github.com/DrEmpiricism/Optimize-Offline)
It is so old some new site do not load correctly anymore. It is becoming unuseable. Possibly M$ is looking for us to have to install 3rd party browser such as chrome or firefox? And the run in administrator mode fix. But then you say Y there are 3rd party browsers with an .exe install that work as well or better. Of course they make hardware to run on recent windows OS which is 2016. The posts of problems are user driven and drivers are available. Possibly those darn russian hackers trying to make us vote against ltsb ;-) How many gens of hardware run win7? JaguarXJ12 does not sound Russian but sure has a problem with LTSB? Possibly ramtest is in order? And to all the Russian out there just tongue and cheek no disrespect intended. Peace n Respect to all. Or switch it to legacy in his bios Uefi need GPT Understand Y then another takes his place ahhh Exactly that is Y people opt for LTSB not to constantly be a beta tester trying to fix M$ problems. Some of the people just do not have the time for that sh!t. 2015 and 2016 have been very dependable OS. 2016 for 3 years and I for one have no probs waiting for the next release. There is so much paper on my desktop I don't even see it in the background ;-). Link please vbox is getting lonely. Regards