I'm an ordinary member just like you. And if this guy can get away with this unsubstantiated bulls**t because it's just his opinion: Then consider my response just my opinion as well. Even tough this should never be a matter of opinion, but hard facts backed by Microsoft and AMD, you know, the people that make Windows, and Zen 2 respectively. Zen 2 aside, my personal experience with literally hundreds of potatoes and not so potatoes have confirmed my "bias" like clockwork. I've seen plenty of devices unable to run above 1507, 1511, 1607 or 1703 (very few), but none unable to run above 1809. That's the only LTSx criteria in my book. From updating to defender scanning to indexing and searching to opening powershell or event viewer, I see 1909 / 2004 faster in daily usage than 1809. If only people would give it a bit of time to settle after install (and complete exfiltrating the data and cache all the candy crush and chredge, mind you). Happy with 1809? Get freaky with it. But if I see any of you posting in the upcoming LTS* thread, you better be sure I'm gonna call you out if I'm still around..