Flash updates are generic, each update has separate version, e.g. 10.0.1.0 but they all update the same component (manifest), and each new update will contain higher version
ok so you're trying to say that v10.0.10 is generic (for flash) but the actual version that mentioned with the manifest is incremental with every update? Correct me if am wrong.
Weird stuff, updated from .113 to .153 via WU, it was stuck on 0%, then after a few minutes restart was required, everything went fine after that. So if you experience the same, just be patient. Might be an issue only for my Win10, dunno.
How about now? Hope it's fine now. I believe you all know I don't have vision. Please don't expect me to be able to super-edit images therefore. Take care.
OK, so what about the ISO\sources\idwbinfo.txt file? It says: Spoiler [BUILDINFO] BuildArch=amd64 BuildType=fre BuildBranch=vb_release OfficialBuild=TRUE MainBuild=FALSE Coverage=FALSE Looking into the same file in build 1909: Spoiler [BUILDINFO] BuildArch=amd64 BuildType=fre BuildBranch=19h1_release OfficialBuild=TRUE MainBuild=FALSE Coverage=FALSE So M$ should change the "BuildBranch" to 2004_release or 20H1_release in the future?
19041 is from the vb_release branch, so changing the branch with a future cumulative update to no longer include vb_release would probably anger the people responsible for servicing at Microsoft.
I don't know why, nothing was wrong with it, was it? If i would have to edit every post i made after someone responded to them i would have a day job with it But you know what, i deleted my post.
Well I mean post number 1148. Just thought those 4 attachment links should not be display normally and should be inside spoiler as you asked me a few times. Honestly still wondering why you ask members to do it What is this SPIOL for? For hiding something from somebody or? What? So as said I'm blind I do not understand is this have something to do with visually displaying of images/texts or something else? Is it a security concern? I understand hiding something like Windows 7 loader in this way is something justifyable but such a simple screenshot, Please explain...
In the past, when the old members still seemed to care, including the staff, it was asked by many users, to use spoilers for large pictures. Considering your longterm membership i can imagine you must have read that multiple times during the years. The quote in my reply doesn't show the large pictures, so why should it be edited?
Some people have a slow internet connection and other limited data bandwidth, not to mention scrolling through so many full size pictures takes time and it is pretty much considered spam for those, who are not concerned.
I did not know that. You just told me. It no matters to me anyway. Thought it should matter to yourself and others who can see.