[DISCUSSION] Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 14257

Are You able to see installed updates ?? I can on a HDD but not in VM Other than having a hard time convincing IE to accept Google as the default search engine and homepage I didn't have any problems surfing the net. There's really not anything new that interested Me so I just ran a few Malware infested torrents to see how easy it was to infect and clean the OS. Deleting all but one bare metal copy (to play some games later) right now and I'll just wait to see what comes next.

 

There is only one update installed. I don't know if there are other updates. I press the "Check for updates" button but after a few seconds says that I am up to date.


I managed to change the default search engine of IE, from Bing to Google. Actualy I removed Bing entirely.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You can use either one. If that's Pro x64 You'll end up with the ISO being 3.62 GB using option #1 and 2.91 Gb using option #2.

 

If you want to burn to a blank DVD then you must use option 1
Create an iso file by selecting option 1 , then burn it to a blank DVD with an iso burning software such as Power Iso , UltraIso , etc..

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

I tried 43 too, but x86 in my case, which may be the difference. Or maybe it's which video you have or any number of other variables.

I've since found two threads and some up-voted posts in Feedback about Flash not working in Firefox in 14251, so for those people, I think it continues in 14257.

The workaround: find mms.cfg (C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Macromed\Flash) and add:
ProtectedMode=0

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

They don't like the way we put the Month before the Day in America

 

The whole world doesn't like it that way, I should say
Anyway, the best way to do it is: year month day, the ANSI way

 

no one should ever do this it's pointless

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

It makes absolutely no sense to modify that file and to give advices how to circumvent Microsoft's "Driver Signature Enforcement".
The Device Manager just shows, what is written within the "DriverVer" line of the associated inf file.
This is the related line of the original Win10 file named hal.inf (it is no real driver, just a text file):
DriverVer=06/21/2006,10.0.14257.1000
So the date shown by the Device Manager is wrong and misleading, because the related INF file is brandnew (look at the driver version), but I don't see any reason to replace a brandnew, flawlessly working and digitally signed original MS file by a home-brewed and not digitally signed one just for the purpose to let the Device Manager show the correct INF file date.

 

Maybe the final product will update it? idk but mine is 6/21/2006 vista era!

 

You just don't understand son i'm running chrome beta 49 and it uses about 6/7 processes and a 1GB of ram, BTW i AM GOOD

 

Yes, it works now again.

Not entirely true, because there were some reg-issues.

 

never not had a build work with k-lite