I doubt (but all it's possible) that microsoft will jump impressive branch to numeric build 101xx, simply because the last awesome_1501 has continued parallel to numeric build 100xx, sure...this branch has been deleted very quickly, but this does not explain why this continue in parallel instead of immediately jumped
my bet is the build 1001xx+ builds are part of the fall update they plan to have the build number of windows 10 rtm i think will probably be 10100 exactly based on what ive seen/heard anything higher then thats the fall threashold 2 update
WTF. If we consider build 10100 as RTM, then it means Msft has already added enough features to Core & Now they're fixing bugs & stability improvements. But it's not true. I can bet you, RTM build no. will NOT be 10100. It'll be 10200 or above...
Sorry, What is Final Beta ? Does it means, no Betas build after that ? BTW, I think, Msft will release a Developer Preview build at BUILD, just like they did during Windows 8 time.
Thank you but nope. There is nothing inside this folder in my PC, "Show hidden files, folders and drives" is enabled Obs.: I created that file in there, didn't work.
build 10100x are probably release candidate branch that are going to be presented at build conference
A final Beta is an real Beta and not something between an Alpha and and Beta! And we'll see what Kind of Build Microsoft will release At those BUILD Conference next week, which were also pronounced as an 'Surprise'!!
Perhaps, but why would Microsoft continue to develop new builds in the fbl_impressive branch beyond 10065 with 10066 and later while all other branches jumped to 10100 that same day?
My netbook is on official 10061 build, uses Daz Loader and it works fine. First build I used was 9926 and they were all official builds not a leaked ones.
lol my guess of 10107 was right m8 r2 though but predicted is accurate. 10107.0.150423-2054.th2_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_x64fre_en-us.esd