h t t p://ms-vnext.net/Win10esds/ is a much better source to know what .esd are done and dusted. I'd enjoy having to play with one of those: 9921.0.150112-1700.fbl_awesome1501_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_x64fre_en-us.esd or 9920.0.150110-2153.fbl_awesome1501_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_x64fre_en-us.esd ... wouldn't you? We're getting hotter and hotter, that's for sure. Roll on next week!!
So what? I don't understand your point... It's (supposedly) build 9920 and not 9921. The fact the string's (supposedly) labelled as fbl_marketplace doesn't show/prove anything. Unless proven, a (and this) screenshot is only what it is... a picture (fake or real).
if real it shows some changes that are not in 9901 (even though its a fbl_marketplace) so you could care a little for fbl_marketplace_dev string btw the screenshot is quite similar to the concepts leaked by cnbeta.
Well... for the record, there are currently 57 lab strings on Windows 10's development schedule so fbl_marketplace_dev is irrelevant among them (just one among tens of others). It stands to reason that what you'd find in one lab branch is also part of others, whatever their name. Differences may be small and depend on developer work groups only, who implement and tests bits on their own. Of course, if you compare builds 9920/9921 to 9901 (even thanks to what we know so far) you're 100% sure to find big visual differences indeed. It seems obvious enough without a screenshot as we're one week away from the JTP. Again, you compare builds 9901 and 9920 (based on a screenshot) whereas I'm talking about fbl_awesome and fbl_marketplace_dev lab strings... (a bit like comparing apples to oranges I may say...) so, yes, one couldn't care less about this or that lab string.
personal opinions. 1.I think every build which shows some change (visual or not) is relevant. 2.Screenshot speaks louder then speculation. also now the screenshot seems more like a photoshop work so better end this discussion
Of course. We'd all love a leak but be lucid guys, don't dream while awake. Meanwhile, those shots look legit, with very clean and modern installation windows. Hopefully, this is not the best to come...
Unfortunately, nothing fundamental actually... and still the same old cr@ppy File Explorer icons (bin, etc...). Sigh... Let's wait for the official JTP build and finally see what's next and new.
Of course, we do agree. ATM though, we only have screenshots, nothing more. But, one has the right to speculate, no doubt about that. AFAIR, PainteR mainly leaked screenshots, not ISOs (but I might be wrong, as I'm an old man, my memory's been faltering of late ). Whatever.
Sorry if this has already been addressed, but on my desktop, the initial build of 9841 is the only one that really plays nice with pretty much everything working perfectly. 9860|9879|9888|9901 all have various issues ranging from small to deal breaker status. When the JTP comes out will I be able to do an upgrade directly to it from 9841, or will I have to go through the process of upgrading to each new build up to the JTP?