I don't use FB so don't know if it says edited or not, but with forums you can disable that feature And if it's your own website, you can do whatever you want Maybe they asked FB to do it for them
Possibly, they were told to keep it to themselves. The confidential guide sent to partners carried the Windows 10 name, boldly written on it. Nobody was able to release the ISO for previous Windows (Windows 10) Technical Preview build images online leading to the press event. We cannot use the press event to define the validity of the 'terms and privacy policy' governing partnership with Microsoft.That is what I am trying to make you see while referring to the coincidence part.
No-one at the event knew, why would they tell everyone before hand, tell them to keep it a secret, and then tell them again during the event ? Think with your brain man, MS wanted to surprise everyone, watch the video before yabba-badda-do'ing
Let me agree it wasn't written on the invitations dispatched to those attending the press event, which is very likely to be possible. But, the Partner Guide could not have been written at the last minute and distributed to them within that short timeframe. My guess was they were aware of the name and made to follow Microsoft terms.
It is not about making sense. It is about reality of the presence of Windows 10 on the Partner Guide. The hint on Mary J.Foley's and Warren's image precluded your statement from been basically what to judge this whole matter on for those who were really aware of the name before the press event. Do you think Mary J.Foley's and Warren's signs to shut it up are for nothing?
Yea I do, have you ever watched windows weekly, or been to zdnet, or winsupersite? They dont keep secrets, they publish everything, true, rumour or otherwise Do some research Your whole theory is based on one photo....
This is the author, Augusto Valdez from MSDN Channel 9 channel9.msdn.com/Events/Speakers/Augusto-Valdez
Try getting it from the PDF reader (mine's Foxit). File > Properties > Description and the info should be there.
If that should be the case. Why would Microsoft make a confidential guide to its partners when it was going to announce it earlier? At least, it's watermarked confidential. Is there something I am missing in the word confidential in the Partner Guide all rather Partner Guidance?
Because it contains minimum system requirements that Microsoft opted not to share publically at this time.
Because some specific information is for partners only. Partner's are a part of the eco-system. So there may be sensitive areas that should be handled on the QnA they have mentioned. May be that's the case. No biggy confidential stuff though.