i think they are the same just not official build avaliable from microsft. files are official but build isnt released officially. yes they work.. just copy paste on address bar adn itll download
They are made by MSFT and the links are from official MSFT servers, why are you saying that they aren't official builds by MSFT? The links are 24hr TEMP URLs. The provided SVFSFX files are available for a much longer time.
My desktop was feeling laggy, noticed on advanced display that my Desktop Signal was different from Active Signal, changing my refresh rate on NVIDIA control panel was not sufficient to apply to desktop signal, so I had to change it on advanced display too. Even when I was using 75hz, just changing this option to 60 and returning to 75 fixed all my animation issues on windows. Weird bug for me
i knew i wasn't so clear as always... as far as i understand maybe am wrong or not clear to express what i meant. official files yes just not an iso released by them.
If it has the ISO extention it is genuine MSFT released ISO, UUP dump generated ISOs are not even allowed to be shared on MDL, so this was the reason of your continued posts that the 26100.560 IP ISOs were not made by MSFT?.
1. The files released at the official Microsoft preview address are all original files, and the images are also produced by Microsoft!!! 2. The files on UUP are also officially released by Microsoft. The only difference is that the original file is the fragmented UUP file you downloaded, but the process of converting to ISO is not operated by Microsoft, but made by you using other tools. Code: | | 26100.560_amd64_en-us_multi_ba068ab5.7z 6.2 GB | | 26100.560_arm64_en-us_multi_54375396.7z 4.7 GB EN-US UUP Archive
AMD Chipset Drivers 6.02.07.2300 installed just fine on my AMD Ryzen 3700X (AMD X570) desktop system. On the note of drivers... for my motherboard (ASUS ROG Strix X570-E Gaming) ASUS releases Realtek audio drivers with some ASUS specific stuff with them, and they always took ages to install (we are talking 5-10 minutes). With 24H2, the same driver "only" took around 90 seconds to install, to the point where I thought the install has likely failed (but it was fine). Please note that the point I am trying to make is that there was a specific use-case (driver installation, or technically speaking multiple small driver installations in one package) that was heavily sped up due to the 24H2 backend improvements. I actually don't care about the Realtek drivers as I mostly use Bluetooth audio, but this is irrelevant to the point.
I need to test this on VHDX first, didn't have time today as for the video.. my display is set to 4k 144 Hz without VRR, not sure how to record it properly, and it's only noticeable when using the mouse, the input is just stops for less than a second and the UI stutters a lot I'm not the only one with this issue so something is really wrong (with the drivers, my software, old platform in general and so on)
what wvv000 below just said. i tought that if it was from uup it wasnt consider oficial even though all files are official and comes from microsft. lets forget about this. lets keep talking about 24H2. yes exactly what i meant to say. sure just was curious how bad it looks.
No issue here on my Ryzen 7950X3D and 4090. What CPU do you have since I see you have a 4080? What resolution and refresh rate?
AMD Ryzen 7800X3D + RTX 4080 @ 4K, 120hz on Desktop Intel i9 13905H + RTX 4060 @ 3K, 144hz on Laptop 23H2 goes like a dream. 24H2 was a stutter fest on both...
All 24H2 ISO links are down Any way to refresh them? I wanted to re-try to upgrade my laptop to Win11 Pro it-it