[DISCUSSION] Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 25314.1000 (PC) [Canary Channel - rs_prerelease]

not available on GitHub at this moment

all download links are on that post

 

I tried that. Did not work for me.

 

Testing it now dont see any real changes install flawlessly no problem in that department.

 

Run the by passer to remove any HW limitation if you're running a older machine, if you're doing a upgrade delete everything inside the software distribution folder and temp folder.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

Win_11_Boot_And_Upgrade_FiX_KiT_v3.0 didnt work....looks like MS is making a bit tougher to bypass HW limitation i will skip this build.

 

Many thanks for your reply but I think I am doing something wrong. Server app was running all the time but I could only get 23403.1000 and not Canary .

Will try again.....

JCC2

Edit: Seems to be working now.... Will confirm

CONFIRMED !!!!! CANARY Build downloaded and is installing right now!!!

 

Just use Windows Update.

 

Can someone check me on this? I don't see any discussion above about anyone on 25309 getting it via WU, just the ISO way.

Is it available via WU in that scenario, especially for unsupported systems that a) DO have the bypass installed (and it had been working up to now) and b) HAVE used OfflineInsiderEnroll 2.6.4 to unenroll/reboot and then enroll in Canary?

WU shows no problems, but no build.

WUMT shows a 0x80244007 warning, also no build.

Have tried going the renaming the Software Distribution folder and rebooting route for good measure. No change.

 

Upgrade Hardware

 

On a supported or unsupported system? I wonder if "Skip_TPM_Check_on_Dynamic_Update.cmd" (I'm using the latest version), needed on an unsupported system, is no longer sufficient?

 

Huh, ok thanks. Short of going the uup route and seeing if that changes things going forward (it might), I don't think there's anything left to try relative to WU, so I'll see if next week's build shows up and/or 0x80244007 goes away.

The only thing that comes to mind right now is maybe what kind of unsupported matters, since there are several levels of that, and something might have been slightly tightened. I'm TPM-free, for example (not even 1.1), whereas someone else might have TPM but not meet the CPU requirement, and they might see different results.

 

I'm not sure why that worked, but it did. Thanks

 

thanks to @Paul Mercer
Used your offline server for the first time today... Kudos
Upgraded to 25314..... No Issues... and am unsupported hardware... go figure