[DISCUSSION] WinPE Builders

Thanks for clearing that up. Yes, I've got 303mb in that folder.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

What are you trying to say
That I should start a new topic? I don't want to, I would like to keep all the PE enthousiasts in one topic

For issues like this, for example:

- Does anyone have any idea why the host OS (in which I run the PE builders) would have an impact on SETACL?
On my test laptop, I have 3 multibooting 64-bit operating systems (freshly updated last week, all clean installs with the same post install tools)
(1) LTSC2016: PhoenixPE builds fine
(2) LTSC2021: SETACL is causing trouble: There is an error setting access on the created build target folder.
(3) LTSC2024: Build is fine, no problems

Why would SETACL behave differently in LTSC2021?

This is where the error occurs in LTSC2021:

Code:

ShellExecute,Hide,%Tools%\%HostArch%\SetAcl.exe," -ot #$qfile#$q -on #$q%Path%#$q -actn ace -actn setprot -op #$qdacl:p_nc#$q -ace #$qn:S-1-1-0;p:full;s:y#$q"

@abbodi1406
I know you're not into PE, but do you have any idea on the SETACL issue? Thanks...

 

Not really, sorry

maybe the target folder current permissions are owned by different user (from other booting system)
or it occur on any new folder for the builder?

 

Thanks for the replies. I just received a tip from Homes32, asking me to test with the "WebClient" services switched to "on" instead of "off".
And low and behold: This seems to do the trick!!!!

So once again: Only in LTSC2021 it is necessary to have this service running, **not** in LTSC2021 or LTSC2024!

@freddie-o
Thanks for editing the OP. "LiveSystemPro" is another great PE builder, it was recently updated and it has a very friendly developer as well.
It would be great if we heard from ChrisR as well, but I can fully understand that he might be too busy at the moment.

 

I'm quite pleased with my current custom W10PXE disk (1.3gb) but there's one change i'd like to make if it's possible: Can the program be configured to boot directly into an admin act rather then making it a 2-step process?

 

Anybody ?

 

You need to login to view this posts content.