::FINALLY:: Windows 7 lo*der - Chinese

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by Maher, Jul 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bono1

    bono1 MDL Novice

    Apr 1, 2008
    46
    1
    0
    works great
     
  2. mazodude

    mazodude MDL Junior Member

    Jan 4, 2009
    59
    2
    0
    most likely, just like when vista sp1 came out :(
     
  3. reb0rn

    reb0rn MDL Junior Member

    Mar 11, 2008
    90
    7
    0
    no MBR loader was blacklisted by SP1 nor SP2....
    only thing disabled was paradox crack files...
     
  4. mazodude

    mazodude MDL Junior Member

    Jan 4, 2009
    59
    2
    0
    I thought the lo*ders for vista sp0 stopped with the installation of sp1 :confused:
     
  5. reb0rn

    reb0rn MDL Junior Member

    Mar 11, 2008
    90
    7
    0
    well paradox first loader was blacklisted but it was not done in MBR so files were in the system, i think thay use some driver to emulate bios ACPI ...
    also bunch of time stopers and rest of the crap were detected by M$ update...
     
  6. mazodude

    mazodude MDL Junior Member

    Jan 4, 2009
    59
    2
    0
    Arn't vista loaders easily detected by M$ now?? (loaders for sp2 and sp1)
    so won't win7 loaders be detected as well?
     
  7. JFMuggs

    JFMuggs MDL Member

    Jan 13, 2009
    181
    1
    10
    There are so many different legitimate boot-up methods in the world amongst all the different BIOS's, multi-boot managers, etc. as well as a multitude of legitimate ways that ACPI/SLIC tables get built, that it would be very difficult to detect and neutralize just those that are cheating Vista/Win7 and not break a ton of legitimate systems in doing so.
     
  8. mazodude

    mazodude MDL Junior Member

    Jan 4, 2009
    59
    2
    0
    #168 mazodude, Jul 31, 2009
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2009
    good old pirates finding a way to beat the system :D
     
  9. Hagen

    Hagen MDL Novice

    Aug 5, 2008
    33
    0
    0
    could enybody help me?? I wrote a post on 16 page, and I still don't get an answear.
    please tell me, what does men that error, which pop up me when I try active windows 7 no matter what activator....
     
  10. lrlr0099

    lrlr0099 MDL Novice

    Jul 31, 2009
    1
    0
    0
    mac boot camp virtualization?

    I know this is a retarted question but is this possible using mac bootcamp? or virtualizations like parallels?
     
  11. Opa

    Opa MDL Addicted

    Jul 29, 2009
    679
    969
    30
    #171 Opa, Jul 31, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: May 23, 2017
  12. greyaburton

    greyaburton MDL Addicted

    Mar 8, 2009
    558
    54
    30
    after trying all the activators and other options.the last option would to do a fresh install and try again.(cause you used the other ones first)
     
  13. greyaburton

    greyaburton MDL Addicted

    Mar 8, 2009
    558
    54
    30
  14. Hagen

    Hagen MDL Novice

    Aug 5, 2008
    33
    0
    0
    #175 Hagen, Jul 31, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: May 23, 2017
  15. Reign_Of_Freedom

    Reign_Of_Freedom MDL Expert

    Aug 1, 2009
    1,247
    467
    60
    Anyone know what method this chinese loader uses? Ex. Slic method or not?
     
  16. ripcord01

    ripcord01 MDL Junior Member

    Jul 30, 2009
    86
    0
    0
    Opa,
    I think it only fair we let Mac users know that after applying either loader by hazar or Orbit your Mac will take approximately 40 seconds to boot Windows. Granted it will be activated but the 40 second boot time is a real pain. So we still need a fix on the Mac side of things.
     
  17. minoverta

    minoverta MDL Member

    Jun 17, 2009
    169
    7
    10
    #179 minoverta, Aug 2, 2009
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2009
    As i said before, i doubt about it if there'll be ever a solution for the 40 seconds delay problem. With Vista it was the same. It's such a shame that nobody takes the effort to solve this. If i was no noob in that area then this problem was already fixed.
     
  18. ripcord01

    ripcord01 MDL Junior Member

    Jul 30, 2009
    86
    0
    0
    A number of us Mac users are working on trying to get it rectified.