NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
The Other Half Of The Big Antarctica Lie Posted on November 3, 2015 by stevengoddard This is big. Bookmark it. “It has nothing to do with climate” Last week, NASA announced that the IPCC is wrong about East Antarctica, which is gaining ice, not losing it. A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers. The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice. “Our main disagreement is for East Antarctica and the interior of West Antarctica – there, we see an ice gain that exceeds the losses in the other areas.” Zwally added that his team “measured small height changes over large areas, as well as the large changes observed over smaller areas. NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses | NASA It didn’t require millions of dollars to figure this out. Researchers in East Antarctica have known for decades that they are gaining ice. The fact the IPCC (and John Cook) didn’t know, is a smoking gun of extreme incompetence and corruption. But the fraud is much worse than it seems. The claimed “collapse of the west Antarctic Ice Sheet was occurring during the cold 1970’s, and scientists knew that it had nothing to do with climate. “We’re seeing the west ice sheet on its way out. It has nothing to do with climate, just the dynamics of unstable ice.” – Dr. Richard Cameron NSF Program Manager for Glaciology 23 Jan 1977, Page 13 This story of Antarctic fraud gets much worse though. The Ross Ice Shelf in West Antarctica has been rapidly retreating more than four feet per day since at least 1830, and possibly for centuries. It has nothing to do with CO2, and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it. 21 Jul 1932 – A Warmer World. But just when you think this story of fraud and corruption at the IPCC can’t get any worse, it does. Eight years ago, the IPCC knew that Antarctica was gaining ice. 10.6.5 Projections of Global Average Sea Level Change for the 21st Century – AR4 WGI Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections They changed their story in 2013 under extreme pressure from governments, which cut almost all of the scientists out of the process. Top climate expert’s sensational claim of government meddling in crucial UN report | Daily Mail Online You can’t make this stuff up, it is straight out of Orwell’s 1984. Only worse.
More on the Progressive Political "Global Warming" HOAX All Driven by control and GREED....follow the money... 1975 – Ice Age Coming, 1.8 Degrees Cooling Over 20 Years Posted on November 4, 2015 by stevengoddard In 1975 there was an ice age coming – evidenced by 1.8 degrees cooling in 20 years, droughts, floods, animals migrating south, polar ice caps expanding, growing seasons shortening, starvation … Chicago Tribune Archive | June 2, 1975 Criminals at NASA have since erased this cooling, and wiped out much of history. A crime against humanity.
I know that something is going on but I can tell you this that Cow Farts are not causing this. Maybe all of The Hot Air coming out of DC is.
The martians are behind it! (I'm beginning to think Al Gore is a martian) http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=98168&page=1
http://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...cade-long-ice-age-predicted-as-sun-hibernates http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/20...gaining-ice-says-NASA.-Is-global-warming-over
If you think that's bad, read on .... The official draft text of the climate treaty for the soon-to-start UN Climate Summit in Paris proposes to establish a global Supreme Court that would rule on issues such as “climate justice,” “climate finance,” “technology transfers,” and “climate debt.” Tucked away on page 19 of the 34-page document is the call for establishing an International Tribunal of Climate Justice. This is no joke either. Read the rest of the article for the truly shocking details of what's planned ahead: http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...-new-un-tribunal-to-judge-us-for-climate-debt
as an old cynic, i tend to look at where the money goes.. it goes to the good boys who get research funds to prove that global warming is real. and it goes to the good boys who play around with energy prices. it goes to the good boys who improve your cars`pollution ratings. and mb it will go to the good boys who prevent us from burning fossil fuels by building a few more nuclear centrals too, in the future. never to the bad boys who are saying that man is bloody arrogant to think that he is capable of changing procecesses that that have been going on since the world was new..
i will be in tallin, at xmas, martian, but you do not repeat not want to hear me sing.. come to think of it, what makes you shun the chatbox, martian? and the thanks button too?
Our booming green-industrial complex built up by administrations of both parties in the US is effectively using the United Nations, its thirty two “sister” institutions — such as the World Bank, UNESCO, and numerous “tribunals” — and hundreds of training and research centers. This huge international bureaucratic buildup is already employing over a million “international civil servants” to administer what our socialist visionaries hope will become the world government of the future. An increasingly important “sister institution” of the UN system is the highly politicized "World Health Department" also known as the World Health Organization (WHO) which, as part of a new scare campaign, has issued new declarations that sausages, hot dogs, bratwurst, and ham are carcinogenic, and that all red meat is “probably carcinogenic.” This new anti-meat campaign, however, is not about your health, but about the “health of the planet.” WHO’s attack on meat is happening just before the Paris gathering on global warming and is a part of the slow motion socialist revolution poorly disguised as “climate change awareness.” As usual, socialist policies today are justified as “necessity for future generations.” Famous Nobel Laureate in physics, Dr. Ivar Giaever, once an Obama supporter, now stands against the president on global warming. “I would say that basically global warming is a non-problem.” Giaever ridiculed Obama for stating that “no challenge poses a greater threat to future generations than climate change.” The physicist called it a “ridiculous statement” and that Obama “gets bad advice” when it comes to global warming. I am sure that Obama and other politicians are peddling the climate change agenda not because of “bad advice,” but because advocates provide them with the argument for central planning and curtailing of individual liberty. The 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, which will be held in Paris from November 30 to December 11, is designed by the Obama administration as the major leap forward toward world government and central planning. It will be the twenty-first yearly session of the Conference of the Parties to the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the eleventh session of the Meeting of the Parties to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. The conference objective is to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, from all the countries, including the US. All globalists were mobilized for preparation to this event. Pope Francis, for example, published an encyclical called Laudato Si’ help to secure success for the conference. The encyclical calls for immediate action against human-caused climate change. The International Trade Union Confederation, which traces its origins back to the First International founded and addressed by Karl Marx, has called for the goal to be "zero carbon, zero poverty," and its general secretary Sharan Burrow proclaimed that there are “no jobs on a dead planet.” The war on meat is part of this public relations blitz. Lord Stern of the UK, a former chief economist of the World Bank, believes that “meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world’s resources. A vegetarian diet is better.” Another Stern, this time our own, is a US special envoy for climate change appointed by the Obama administration to secure a strong climate agreement at the Paris climate conference. Ambassador Todd Stern is now traveling to Brazil and Cuba to obtain support from these corrupt socialist governments to stand against “the global threat of climate change.” In the US, socialist zealots and their “capitalist” cronies have already destroyed the coal industry and the whole energy sector is under attack. Now they are after the meat industry which is, according to them, “unsustainable.” The left-wing Union of Concerned Scientists lists meat-eating as the second-biggest environmental hazard facing the Earth. (Number one is fossil-fuel vehicles.) In the Soviet Union, when it existed, beef was available only to Communist Party functionaries and everybody else could only find it on the black market. It was “explained” to the masses that meat was bad for their health. In Cuba today you cannot find beef in the food stores. Ground beef (usually mixed with soy), chicken, sausage, and ham are rationed by the government in the amount of a half pound per person every fifteen days. My Cuban friends complain, however, that most of these deliveries are unreliable and can be “canceled” without any explanation. In the US, the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee worked on concocting a 571-page report of pseudoscientific “evidence” to encourage Americans to avoid red meat. US departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services will use this junk science to guide federal nutrition policy, including the $16 billion school lunch program. And it’s all being done at our own expense. The United States is bankrolling the UN and its “sister” institutions, including WHO, from one-quarter to one-third of their operating budgets. Let’s hope we don’t get all the world government we’re paying for.
It's the fault of termites, those pesky critters. Actually, I think it does not exist except as an effort at control.
Nowadays US (Chicago School of Economics) 'administrations' = socialist? Not even in your very, very bad nightmares!!!!!
FWIW I think it is a natural cycle which has been severely impacted by the the industrial revolution and products resulting from the industrial revolution. I do know that the summers here are a whole lot hotter and more humid than they were in the 60's and 70's. So my answer to the poll would be both.
If you think of all the proven and suspected factors that influence the climate, the only answer to the question ought to be: No, I do not know if the change is man made or not. Any different answer simply tells the reader, that you consider your answer correct, because it is what YOU believe! You might want to read a book written by Habermas almost 50 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_and_Human_Interests Even more stupid is the idea, that even it is man-made, that this could somehow be stopped... That suggestion is a real joke, but, given the stupidity of mankind, it gets politicians re-elected.