[GUIDE] [DISCUSSION] Windows Editions Reconstructions

you have to edit Microsoft-Windows-Enterprise-Desktop-Shared-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.26100.1.mum - professional -> wnc or nxt (i don't remember exactly)

 

I did for that and I did that for Microsoft-Windows-Enterprise-Desktop-Shared-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.26100.1.mum and Microsoft-Windows-Enterprise-Desktop-Shared-removable-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.26100.1.mum

But due of this dll, it causes this error

 

try something else - when you reconstruct wnc, add enterprise-desktop-shared to editionpack-nxt and enterprise-desktop-shared-wow64 to editionpack-nxt-wow64. then these packages will be in the image - no need to add them later

 

Do you mean always there in the packages/images in terms of definitions ? If so, I would find insightful to find a way to extract the whole definition of a given edition from a Windows image as distinct artefacts (as xml or json files, resources, certificates, …) or something similar.

From these edition definition artefacts of editions, a unique and common new script or software should be able to generate recipes to reconstruct a lot of distinct Windows images of one or many editions. Am I missing something ?

Do you know what would be the blocking factors that would technically prevent the creation of custom editions ?

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

Well only 10586, 14393 and 15063 starter packages are pushed to the public, the rest builds contain traces of its existence but packages unavailable

 

[28000.4 Enterprise install.wim (with Edge\Store without Winre) amd64 en-US]

[Base A]
Test #1: 3,962,556 KB

[Base B]
Test #1: 3,962,573 KB
Test #2: 3,962,455 KB
Test #3: 3,962,684 KB

 

constructed 26100.1 enterpriseseval pl-pl by MUCS


i took 23h2 iso to install

with 24h2 iso there is "windows installation encountered unexpected error 80070490 4002c"


i don't get it what microsoft messed up (there is a reason why "previous version of setup" option is available in official 24/5h2 isos)

there was a problem with WD drives at one time if i remember correctly

 

Read this: 26100.1.240331-1435.ge_release_CLIENT_LTSC_EVAL_x64FRE_pl-pl.iso

 

i forgot about Microsoft-Windows-Security-SPP-Component-SKU-EnterpriseSEval-Eval-Package, thx for reminder

there is no pl-pl of ltsc eval iso

in my ei.cfg
[channel]
eval

in ei.cfg from official en-us ltsc eval there is
[channel]
eval
[vl]
0

 

constructed 26100.7462 enterpriseseval pl-pl by MUCS with gailium119's defender removal

installed from 23h2 iso

thanks to xinso for reminder

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

constructed 19045.5131 x64 enterpriseg by MUCS

trying to use xinso's "older license" method to integrate .6693 online https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...s-reconstructions.88605/page-186#post-1899796

Failed to verify if mum file \\?\C:\Windows\CbsTemp\31228452_978874297\Microsoft-Windows-Security-SPP-Component-SKU-EnterpriseG-License-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.19041.6456.mum is vouched for by catalog \\?\C:\Windows\CbsTemp\31228452_978874297\Microsoft-Windows-Security-SPP-Component-SKU-EnterpriseG-License-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.19041.6456.cat. [HRESULT = 0x800b0100 - TRUST_E_NOSIGNATURE]


when trying to integrate offline, hash error again (80092004 this time)


in both cases i can generate new .cat, but i would rather avoid it for now

 

gailium's way is the best in my opinion.

 

with .6691 same situation

 

You have to sysprep anyway.

 

with sysprep this will work https://forums.mydigitallife.net/th...s-reconstructions.88605/page-205#post-1901609