So tell me one thing, you're the one who assembles the .mum, for example the professionaedition is all in the sessions.xml, right, and the specific is all copied from the update .mum of the package, is that it?
I want to learn how to do the reconstructions of each one, understand, learning how to make packages and modify the .mum and make
Well, it's difficult, without a horizon you can't do anything about reconstruction, I know how to do many other things in programming, I'm looking for a theory to learn, because if I keep banging my head without knowing where I came from and where I'm going, it doesn't work, good reconstructions for you.
no, i don't understand why it is so hard for you, when everything you need is already there on uup dump, all you need is to understand the basics of how to put it all together,...
I think what @Bira basically means is that he wants to learn about reconstructing editions. First you need a script, you can start with Whatever127's scripts, these are basic but their function is easy to understand.. As for the esd files, I need to see better what you mean, so I can help you. Before using any script, you should know what this script does, what command it applies, so starting with whatever127 scripts is an option.
I've understood everything you said for a long time, I want to know how to make packages, and modify .mum just like xinso and others did, just put it in a specific edition and that's it, no complications, now for those of us who are starting to understand this, it's a 0 in the head, rectifying, let's learn not the reconstruction, but rather make the packages for reconstruction, leaving the .mum ready to just install and rebuild, but I have to understand the theory of .mum and the packages, how it's done
Windows\servicing\Sessions\Sessions.xml is what you need to learn... for each version you are going to build...
Okay, let's go, Acer, we're starting to talk about the right thing, where I wanted to get to This goes in Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15.mum, right? Can I copy these updates by taking an update.mum and an update.cat from the package? Code: <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-EnterpriseG-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-EnterpriseG-WOW64-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Client-Features-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Client-Features-WOW64-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-Enterprise-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-EditionPack-Enterprise-WOW64-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-WOW64-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Holographic-Desktop-Merged-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Holographic-Desktop-Merged-WOW64-Package"/> <Resolve package="Microsoft-Windows-EnterpriseGEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15" update="Microsoft-Windows-Holographic-Desktop-Analog-Package"/> making this shape Code: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='yes'?> <assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v3" copyright="Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved." manifestVersion="1.0"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-StarterEdition" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> <package identifier="Windows Starter Edition" releaseType="Product"> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="visible"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-Starter-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-Starter-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-Starter-WOW64-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-Starter-WOW64-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-Client-Features-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-Client-Features-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> <update name="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-WOW64-Package"> <package contained="false" integrate="hidden"> <assemblyIdentity buildType="release" language="neutral" name="Microsoft-Windows-RegulatedPackages-WOW64-Package" processorArchitecture="amd64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" version="10.0.15063.0"/> </package> </update> </package> </assembly> and rename update.mum and update.cat to this Microsoft-Windows-EditionSpecific-EnterpriseG-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15
Is this a product or a Feature Pack? Code: <package identifier="Windows Starter Edition" releaseType="Product">
@iamaHUN How do you find the minimal file list need for an edition at sxs folder ( mums, manifets, folders) Also can you share Enterprise LTSC and other editions. Previously shared construction packages in here was edited files. Original files will be better.
Now I believe it was changed from product to feature knowing which one and the image is fine Code: ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ### IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION ##################################################### ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ Build 16299 Architecture x64 Reconstruction Core EnterpriseG Building Mounting install.wim Ferramenta de Gerenciamento e Manutenção de Imagens de Implantação Versão: 10.0.26100.1 Montando a imagem [==========================100.0%==========================] A operação foi concluída com êxito. Building Start building convert XML EnterpriseG Ferramenta de Gerenciamento e Manutenção de Imagens de Implantação Versão: 10.0.26100.1 Versão da Imagem: 10.0.16299.15 Removing package Microsoft-Windows-CoreEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15 Removing package Microsoft-Windows-CoreEdition~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~10.0.16299.15 [==========================100.0%==========================] A operação foi concluída com êxito. . . Integrate Set EnterpriseG key Integrate Try applying edition unattend Ferramenta de Gerenciamento e Manutenção de Imagens de Implantação Versão: 10.0.26100.1 Versão da Imagem: 10.0.16299.15 A operação foi concluída com êxito. Current Edition EnterpriseG [Volume] ....................
It looks like I accidentally merged the folder with another one that contained the files from 19041.1 arm64 reconstruction. You can ignore those of course.
Microsoft started to use reverse deltas with the update 1742? Thats how you can reverse back. All reconstructed editions before 1 October should be edited files as far as i know. I do not know how it is for windows 10. I have EnterpriseS-19041.1-x64.7z and EnterpriseS-19041.1-x64_rev.7z Do not know whose packages are they. Better to use reverse delta created packages if you make new ones. You did not answered how do you find which files need.
Those two 7z archives are absolutely fine, they contents are also created using reverse deltas. Otherwise they wouldn't be updatable. Microsoft uses reverse/forward delta patches since Windows 10 build 18362 (1903/19H1). About your other question, if you need the minimum files to add another edition to your image (e.g. EnterpriseS to Professional), mount Pro to C:\mount1 and C:\mount2. Then from EnterpriseS copy everything from its \Windows\servicing\Packages folder to C:\sxs, do the same with \Windows\winsxs and \Windows\winsxs\Manifests to have everything in one folder. After this just simply stage EnterpriseS from C:\sxs to C:\mount2 (do not remove Pro), then compare the content of C:\mount1 and C:\mount2 with a program that can show the differences. Then you can collect the files from C:\mount2 that don't exist in C:\mount1.
Yes they are fine and updateable. Just thought they were edited from other mums and manifests. Good info thats does not explained previously in here.
Manifests, mums and catalogs cannot be recreated using deltas. They are the only ones that you have to create yourself. But it's not a problem, since the next rollup will probably contain a new version of them, and you can get rid of the old ones using resetbase. There's one exeption for sure, it's Microsoft-Windows-MediaPlaceholder-Package which never gets a new version. That's why in ARM64 N editions its catalog stays "edited", but it won't cause any problem. BTW in build 17763 and earlier, the inappropriate catalogs can cause errors, because they never get replaced with newer ones by updates. In this case they can prevent online edition upgrades using product keys (e.g. from Home to Pro), since their signature is invalid.