[GUIDE] [DISCUSSION] Windows Editions Reconstructions

I apologise for my ignorance, but, what is the advantage of rebuild one edition that is already available?

 

One reason would be, learning to construct reconstruction builds, as close to official builds as possible, then use this info to build non official builds.

 

It has not always been available for ex u n e whether download or n finds but has a core or a professional, this you can rebuild for an burning that many do not have the burial and you have not found anywhere, just knowing how to rebuild and learning

 

does anyone have 20348/20349 to EnterpriseS?
also do updates work?

 

This is great stuff...

But the language packs links are down.

 

Q: For reconstruction, are 14357.1000 and 14393.0 compatible?
A: No.

 

Q: How to integrate the following 25398.950 components to 25398 CUs from 25398.1009 froward?

Code:

    <update name="43CAAFED32D80EE5BFA6F58C97B4F8DE3F951119D35374BF42EEB6DD7384066B">
      <component>
        <assemblyIdentity name="microsoft-windows-client-desktop-required-deployment0" version="10.0.25398.950" processorArchitecture="amd64" language="en-US" buildType="release" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" versionScope="nonSxS" />
      </component>
    </update>

 

gailium119 said that he\she will share 20348.1 Client with 20348.3207 CU...

en-US? 38-languages?

 

.

 

No time to do this atm, probably the next month cu

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

amd64_microsoft-windows-branding-shell-client_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_badedf0fd0592395.manifest - original, compressed
amd64_microsoft-windows-c..equired-deployment0_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_0338861fbc795eeb.manifest - modified, not compressed
amd64_microsoft-windows-iorate_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_b229311b9de6f047.manifest - original, compressed

Specially archive with these files I have attached it, if there are any questions about this

So, *.manifest should be compressed or decompressed before making *.cdf?

I only decompressed, actually, it wasn't even me who decompressed it, it was already decompressed from uupdump.net

amd64_microsoft-windows-c..equired-deployment0_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_0338861fbc795eeb.manifest

for editing,
I did not touch the other .manifest.

Is there a program at all that can provide information about what hashes and what files are in a file in a specific *.cat?

In the link above to iamaHUN post, the bottom poster has an example *.cdf

Thanks, it outputs hashes, but does not show the names of the files the hashes belong to. I have not found this option yet.

In Microsoft-Windows-Client-Desktop-Required-Package.ESD from the link above, downloaded from uupdump.net, part of *.manifest is already decompressed
Including decompressed
amd64_microsoft-windows-c..equired-deployment0_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_0338861fbc795eeb.manifest

 

read my previous post.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

with all your respects on a Winvos Winpe
I'm looking for the little beast my OS is 1.9 GB with errors net 4.5 at the first start after it's good 24h2 still in test mode the shell!!

 

I don't get it, makecat uses the *.cdf format as a list

[CatalogFiles]
<hash>1=B:\enterprise\amd64_microsoft-windows-branding-shell-client_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_badedf0fd0592395.manifest

makecat is designed to automatically determine the hash and write it to *.cat

And you suggest manually entering the hash into *.cdf, and how should it look? Please provide an example of the format of such an entry in *.cdf

Or do you want to say that the hash that is written according to the iamaHUN instructions is not suitable, and the hash entered manually will allow you to get rid of Error: 0x80092004?

I saw many variants of writing *.cdf in the topic from respected gurus, but I have never encountered your variant, give an example of such a record

In *.cdf there is only such parameter
HashAlgorithms=SHA256

If you meant this parameter, then which one should you choose? It is not SHA256? Then which one? Respected gurus indicate something like SHA256, is this not so?

 

yes, manually entering the hash

for example:

[CatalogHeader]
Name=update.cat
PublicVersion=0x00000001
EncodingType=0x00010001
CatalogVersion=2
HashAlgorithms=SHA256
ResultDir=.\
CATATTR1=0x00010001:OSAttr:2:5.1,2:5.2,2:6.0,2:6.1,2:6.2,2:6.3,2:10.0
[CatalogFiles]
e+q80mUA5Y0tHgkJT5X8P1SfsdO5cV+eE3c5yn+je2g=B:\enterprise\amd64_microsoft-windows-branding-shell-client_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.20348.1_none_badedf0fd0592395.manifest

 

I never enter the hash manually. I let makecat.exe generate it.