How-To Write a Slic-OEM driver x64 ( educational purpose only )

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by secr9tos, Nov 24, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. frwil

    frwil MDL Addicted

    Sep 22, 2008
    543
    199
    30
    #201 frwil, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2010
    There're plenty of other options, indeed, besides "truthinjection" you may try WoW6/7, or "old good" bootmgr patch, or the newest pure mbr patch (which is missing on this forum for some reason), or even Enterprise version with WZT's pseudo-KMS activator.
     
  2. MasterDisaster

    MasterDisaster MDL Expert

    Aug 29, 2009
    1,255
    675
    60
    Can you PM me the link to this mbr patch.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  3. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
    #203 cba1986, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: May 23, 2017
  4. Daz

    Daz MDL Developer

    Jul 31, 2009
    9,526
    67,288
    300
    @ Jinje
    I guess you didn't read my earlier posts.

    It's not that the new one has a flaw it's that the old one had a flaw which was corrected for other hardware (non-Intel). By that I mean the older one works for this guy, it add's a SLIC but it may break other tables in the process because it's not a "good" SLIC placement and with WAT installed he doesn't pass activation due to the bad SLIC placement.

    WAT from my testing does check the SLIC's position for emulation and it also will flag some systems based on the branding, it's unfortunate but I thought about this from the start and it's the reason I first placed brand specific SLIC's and certificates with a loader while everyone else was using static files.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  5. Mr Jinje

    Mr Jinje MDL Expert

    Aug 19, 2009
    1,769
    1,106
    60
    #206 Mr Jinje, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2010
    LOL, no I haven't had time to read them all. So your saying it only passes WAT on some machines, Gotcha
     
  6. Daz

    Daz MDL Developer

    Jul 31, 2009
    9,526
    67,288
    300
    That version yes, it was kind of forceful in the older builds where as in the newer ones it plays nice the best it can. If it wasn't for the SLIC placement being off it could probably work *if* theres no branding check done against Intel from the WAT update.

    Nice of PMR to help the guy out though, props to you for that (@ PMR).
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  7. Mr Jinje

    Mr Jinje MDL Expert

    Aug 19, 2009
    1,769
    1,106
    60
    So why isn't he using RemoveWAT ? I assume that is already off the table or this would be a short conversation ?
     
  8. PAYMYRENT

    PAYMYRENT MDL Developer

    Jul 28, 2009
    1,445
    421
    60
    because he is using the key i gave him
     
  9. Daz

    Daz MDL Developer

    Jul 31, 2009
    9,526
    67,288
    300
    #210 Daz, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2010
    Been suggested, same with ChewWGA but he really wanted the genuine status without modifying system files a whole lot... well thats from what I understand after reading various posts.

    My one suggestion was to stick with the version that adds a SLIC and simply not install the WAT update, it wouldn't have effected system updates or anything really. Then again would MS force feed the WAT update to everyone via SP1 anyway? Can't say for sure but it adds allot of time into saving up for a licence, well that or in this case getting one for free if PMR feels a little bad for you :p
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  10. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
  11. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
    I didn't realise that Intel mobos were so problematic. Lesson learned, no more intel mobos, they are hard to OC and hard to mod.

    Thanks..
     
  12. secr9tos

    secr9tos MDL Addicted

    Jul 28, 2009
    997
    133
    30
    #214 secr9tos, Feb 22, 2010
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2010
    (OP)
    The major problem is that there is no intel-slic so there is no guarantee that u pass online genuine check
     
  13. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
    Damn shame. becouse they are good mobos(I never had a problem), but always is a catch 22.
     
  14. pkaji123

    pkaji123 MDL Addicted

    Aug 22, 2009
    762
    235
    30
    Of Course You're right,me too currently using an intel MB,I was fed up with that,I would some time rather think of putting it in a Dustbin,Bcoz no loaders nothing is working on it,What to do $$ will not allow me to do that...
    PMR really saved me,I would say a countless thanks to him..
     
  15. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
    What model of Mobo do you have?
     
  16. pkaji123

    pkaji123 MDL Addicted

    Aug 22, 2009
    762
    235
    30
    Intel D945GCNL M/B.
     
  17. omdhar

    omdhar MDL Junior Member

    Aug 1, 2009
    94
    40
    0
    I have one Intel DG965RY. I couldnot put slic inside bios but running well with ldr.
     
  18. cba1986

    cba1986 MDL Member

    Nov 17, 2009
    102
    4
    10
    Must be about the model perhaps in older Intel's mobos, the ldr works fine.