KB4462930 is not CU, it's an update for Adobe Flash Player. CU is KB4464330 For users who previously installed 17763.1 when it was officialy available for download: 17763.1 + CU (KB4464330) = 17763.55
Did you compare if any difference between this way and integrate SSU (KB4465477) and CU (KB4464330) on 17763.1 ISO? I think KB4462930 is not CU but flash player update?
I have a work around for the "Open with" bug, it seems to only affect portable programs. So the best solution at the moment is to use the installer version of an affected program. In my case Foxit reader portable is affected. After I installed Foxit reader I could again select the portable version as the default pdf reader.
in my previous post above about the start menu so i fresh install again what's this in oobe , i think i wait a month MS is playing around still or maybe install without internet
Hey guys, is there any difference between installing 17763.1 then the CU (KB4464330) update => build will be 17763.55 And Clean installing the fresh iso 17763.55 directly? (however i think that this iso is not available yet. )
I have this problem for two days, I have already done three installations of version 1809. Not happy I tried the old version 1803 and the start menu is not complete here too .... I enclose screenshot
use layoutmodifications.xml...It may have been documented here at MDL already, but in case: Customize your start menu and (in PS): Export-StartLayout -Path C:\TEMP\LayoutModification.xml Copy LayoutModification.xml file to the 'C:\Users\Default\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Shell' folder You can also set these keys: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ContentDeliveryManager] "PreInstalledAppsEnabled"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ContentDeliveryManager] "PreInstalledAppsEverEnabled"=dword:00000000 ps: Note that if you also set ContentDeliveryAllowed = 0 there, as I saw recommended in few places, you won't be able to deploy immersive shell with Get-AppxPackage -allusers | foreach {Add-AppxPackage -register "$($_.InstallLocation)\appxmanifest.xml" -DisableDevelopmentMode} So, in case immersive shell is broken and it shows error at deployment, the advice is to first verify this 'ContentDeliveryAllowed' value. ps2: You may have to delete the TileDataLayer folder from 'C:\Users\Default\AppData\Local' also (this one I'm not sure, surely @abbodi1406 knows better) ps3: one can also delete unwanted appx with DISM++ , and instead of setting the PreInstalledAppsEnabled keys, just delete unwanted appx packages from ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\AppRepository (with Nsudo) so that they can't be deployed again. And if you ever have leftovers/corrupted unremovable apps, I gave a solution in DISM++ thread to clean your apprepository.
Yes, i believe i've posted that when it was possible to do again, 10240 had all target editions and iirc they were available again in 1803 or was it 1709? Base wim contains Home, Home N, 2019 LTSC and N 2019 LTSC: Code: 1. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 2. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 3. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 4. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 5. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 6. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 7. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 8. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 9. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 10. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 11. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 12. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 13. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 14. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 15. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 16. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 17. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 18. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 19. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 20. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 21. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 22. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 23. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 24. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 25. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise 2019 LTSC x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 26. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise 2019 LTSC x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 27. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N 2019 LTSC x86 nl-NL (17763.55) x86" 28. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N 2019 LTSC x86 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x86" 29. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 30. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 31. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 32. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Home N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 33. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 34. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 35. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 36. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Professional N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 37. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 38. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 39. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 40. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Education N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 41. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 42. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 43. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 44. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Education N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 45. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 46. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 47. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 48. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Pro-Workstation N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 49. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 50. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 51. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 52. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 53. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise 2019 LTSC x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 54. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise 2019 LTSC x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64" 55. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N 2019 LTSC x64 nl-NL (17763.55) x64" 56. "Win 10 (1809 RS5) Enterprise N 2019 LTSC x64 nl-NL (17763.55 - MRP) x64"
I installed notepad++ and sumatrapdf and installing didn't make a difference. Open with still needed to be done twice with their respective extensions like txt, log, pdf, cbr, etc. I installed 7zip and .zip wouldn't change at all unless I ran 7zfm as admin and forced the change (and a reg tweak to change the ugly icon). I even did a fresh install to test the installers. It's pretty badly broken for now.
Well i don't know too, but I'm waiting for MS to release an 1809 iso without any bugs so i can clean install it. By the way does anyone know how much it can take MS to release this kind of iso? Waiting is hard.
How hard is it for MS or anybody to understand that in the vast number of feedback, some very rare/important bugs/improvements may go unnoticed by users? in that case if MS criteria to take action on any feedback, is the number of up-votes/comments, then isn't ms making a mistake or lets say a stupid mistake? and if number of up-votes is not the criteria then why they didn't cover that feedback and asked followup question about the scenarios? or they just thought that the person who reported the deletion bug is just doing a prank? Their feedback hub seems like to work as complaint box at government offices, not taking it serious enough. I myself have reported many issues of w10 in feedback hub months ago and nobody cared about those issues. and yes they are real issues. besides that iirc their was a most upvoted post about removal of advertisement in start menu and auto downloading apps, and even it was most upvoted they don't give a fcuk, they just foolishly think that those advertisement and tons of unnecessary apps auto download and install is making user experience better.
so what i gather is that if i aint worried about losing any data then the current consumer & ltsc isos are just fine for a fresh install of windows 10. is that correct ?