[INFO] Windows 2000 and 9x CD Info

Look at bottom of SETUPPP.INF - I think your image is dated early 1996 and you should find:
SubVersionString = "a"

Most likely Windows 95A OSR1 with Plus!

 

Thanks Sajjo.

Code:

[Strings]
SubVersionString = "a"   ; for final freeze replace w/ " r-#" where # is subversionnumber

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

Code:

CRC Verification Utility, Version 3.05
Copyright (C) Microsoft, 1992-1997

100% complete

CRC of media in K: (616775680 bytes) is 0xD56D9C4F

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

What I meant is since my image is in MODE1/2352, it won't work if your image is in MODE1/2048. Both images should be using the same mode. If you can convert yours to MODE1/2352, then you can do a remote scan using ImageDiff that will work with my image.

 

Yes, that's correct.

I refered to image (iso) from WinWorld -> #145 where my source come from.
I don't have the physical media (CD) of this release.
You can't convert iso to bin/cue, mdf/mds etc and expect same binaries.
Technically you can but how would I/we determine the extra unknown data that is added by these formats?

If it was a image of a game, for example, with copy protection embedded, I would delete a iso image. No questions asked.
No way I could replicate those extra data embedded to make it functional or even qualifie it as a 1:1 dump.

 

after redump the WinWord PC Version

Code:

MSCDCRC 4.26 CD-ROM Disc Verification Utility
Copyright (C) Microsoft, 1992-2004
DDP (R) is trademark of DCA Inc. and is Licensed from DCA Inc.

MSCDCRC: Verifying file b:\tmp\Microsoft Windows 95A OSR1 and Microsoft Plus (OEM) (ISO)\ENG_CDPLUS_19960117.iso (616,775,680 bytes)

100% complete

MSCDCRC: Computed CRC is 0xD38772B5
MSCDCRC: SHA1 hash is 0x36808C3AFEC41387C899C9D7E761A60C1D0631FC

in binary File comparison with

Code:

E291F64566E128F71722B019821EC72428D49C03 *[ENU] win95a_osr1.0_OEM-Companion_cd_type09_19960117.iso
EBE58EECE412B9E5575705CF217917B105B9AE61 *[ENU] win95a_osr1.0_OEM-FullSetup_cd_type09_19960116.iso

;win95 first release (only WIN95\  DRVPLUS.BIN and SCANPLUS.EXE Files compared
9F4EE7D18A757D50497AF47ABB6E853F1AFBB288 *[ENU] win95_PLUS__________cd_19950716.iso

;win95c_osr2.5 - ISO (only PLUS\*.* Folder compared)
B9B87CFEDEC356574B737E533EC667F0E42988B0 *[ENU] win95c_osr2.5_OEM-FullSetup_PLUS_cd_type09_19971201.iso

my conclusion:
- i dont find a File bug inside the WWPC Version
- i dont find a Filetime bug WWPC Version (exact the same time as the valid isos posted before
- possibly Timestamp bug, but unlikely

@ssjkakaroto
i guess that you have probably 1 or two byte ripping bugs (this can happen)
PS: you have to convert your
MODE1/2352 raw image to MODE1/2048 iso image to find and fix your bug
(bugfix can only done for MODE1/2048 iso image - raw image fix become invalid coz Subchannel Q -Data coud not be valid fixed)

We should first try to find the mistake between your ISO and the WWPC ISO together

 

You can only check the file after uploading it, but there is nothing there. Are you asking for a riddle game here?

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

@vanelle I think there's some misunderstanding here. My image is good as I have dumped it with two different drives using DiscImageCreator and got identical files. If you have some time, please check Redump and TOSEC projects and you'll see how thousands of game images are dumped and preserved this way with consistent results across the world.
While you are interested in the ISO file that someone at Microsoft made, I'm interested in preserving what was actually written to disc.
Just as an example, I also have an original Windows 98 Upgrade disc that matches the following TOSEC dump:

Code:

<rom name="Microsoft Windows 98 Upgrade (1998-03)(Microsoft).bin" size="748688640" crc="1edcdad9" md5="53b671f34ad9658c9452fdbec294100d" sha1="df68bd2596f2b62f59e0e883b6cf86ee41ded619"/>

I don't mind that it doesn't match any known ISO file because I know my dump is good and verified by other people that also have the exact same disc.
Also, I ran CRC 3.05 on the DISC (not the image) and got 0xD56D9C4F. If you still doubt that's correct, then I can't help you.
So I'll just leave my disc's hashes again here in case someone in the future searches for them:
Microsoft Windows 95A OSR1 and Microsoft Plus! (OEM)

Code:

<rom name="ENG_CDPLUS.bin" size="709038624" crc="37518f60" md5="f8ccc309a1b3cdb485396be93bd0c1fa" sha1="339b272bb3bfbe73cb803e8eb8fb49c4b0306986" sha224="2b3257c7d5a3512fe7de4f2271f38b904695586e862fb07bd1188029" sha256="117bc8a63a2c7dfb659f0d63711194a63b378c30684a0856093e9f644934d6f9" sha384="8a1d72e4b550c94410411c5ecabe8dae211de15dd41f4f33c785f6afb8c769a8a8a64fb7c92e2472c739f4bdff2da56b" sha512="3a641befa153cd5fa36e904c54f37734a68d0f98920bad20a29e8f5bc5f5077d268e4a78d95ba4fce470ab009fe1bc40e05797c399561c7c1204f9757633a6a7" xxh3_64="9caf3a3e232168f2" xxh3_128="b4bcfdf6380a079a9caf3a3e232168f2" />

 

You need to login to view this posts content.

 

Yes, Microsoft has so many programs, and it’s not just about the system, and there’s no need to focus on Korea. Some people need other languages.

 

If you have a picture of the CD, please upload it and read what vanelle said carefully.