Maybe the next update is "windows 8.1 spring update 2014". But why the name so long ? windows 8.1.1 or windows 8.1 update 1 is enough.
No, because the delta only refers to the version of the file that is being looked up, in your case HAL. Same way as BuildLabEx refers to Microsoft-Windows-OS-Kernel only. The base always remains the delta of the foundation package, not that of any child component.
I didn't mix them. you can't separate win 8.1 and win 8.1 update. win 8.1 update is not new OS (like win 8.1, that have different kernel).
Does it matter? Unless you can do something now that you couldn't before, I don't see the point. Perhaps you want some validation for updating your system? Yes, having an updated system is much safer than not updating it.
I got this using aida64, installed 8.1 RTM and applied MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.8.1.2014.UPDATE.X64.ONLY.MSU.9600.17025.WINBLUE_GDR.140214-1706-WZT, all 4 updates in it, then downloaded all the updates in windows update. --------[ Operating System ]-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating System Properties: OS Name Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise OS Language English (United States) OS Installer Language English (United States) OS Kernel Type Multiprocessor Free (64-bit) OS Version 6.3.9600.17025 (Win8.1 RTM) OS Service Pack - OS Installation Date 3/5/2014 OS Root C:\Windows" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17025 explorer.exe too