lmao, @Whistler4Ever, it's fun to see you got pissed. Anyway, many people had pointed out the files were digitally stamped on Jul 5(or 6?), it could only be done by MS, so everything is original, if you are not happy with the legit MS digital signatures, then wait for a official download from MS official sites. Btw, I just couldn't help lmfao when I saw WZor said that a build with 16384 delta is a escrow.
Now read back through this thread and tell other long term members that they are also wrong, highly respected members at that Example:
Finally someone who understands what my point is. Thank you. Someone's position doesn't determine their experience with distinguishing the validity of a build. By no means I am trying to say that veteran respected members are dumb, my point is that despite I am inactive here, I have my fair share of knowledge and people not getting a simple explanation does quite piss me off.
>long term, highly respected member >implying they cannot screw up and talk crap I don't even believe how naive people like MrMagic can be.
Problem with 7600.16384? It was the first win7 RTM sign-off candidate, placed in the "RTM sign-off candidate folder" in corpnet, but it failed the sign-off test-runs, so a next candidate 7600.16385 took its place in the corpnet folder, passed the test-runs, and got signed off as win7 RTM.
I think I'm right in saying there was a thread for it earlier on which got deleted - non compliance with MDL rules. Unofficial ISO and ppl posting links to it = thread deleted.
Sad to see some users here like @MrMagic judge someone's legitimacy from no. of posts, he made at MDL. And AFAIK, @Whistler is quite trustworthy for Beta stuff.
HO-HO-HO. This inane gibberish over a dozen pages, and sometimes hundreds, far more useful pair of links to the same torrents.