@plangg Take checksums and filenames with "a little" grain of salt but back in time it claims to be good. Can only be for sure if you find and upload file. It's not much but better than nothing i guess.... Checksums are MD5 And usa_2600__x86fre.per_whistler.iso is earlier than RTM released image FYI (days - there was some last minute changes) Code: Windows XP Professional 120-day Evaluation WXPEVL_EN usa_2600_x86eval.pro_whistler.iso size: 488.59 MB (512,325,632 bytes) 0227f25ed04d54488b5f52fb4239ba46 *usa_2600__x86fre.per_whistler.iso d1f3716dce6233ab353032c6b67ef40e *usa_2600_x86eval.pro_whistler.iso 36c7fe8b9d9b0d14296d1a380e907867 *usa_2600__x86chk.pro_whistler.iso b3c25315840fdf440760401e95022c35 *usa_2600__symcd2.sym_whistler.iso
@plangg You could always ask in chat box if anyone with access would be so kind and help you download image. I dont have access so cant do much good for you.
svf source.File = en_winxp_pro_x86_build2600_iso.img source.Size = 512342016 source.CRC32 = ffffffff source.SHA1 = 1400ded4402d50f3864ed3d8dcf5cc52ba79a04a target.File = WXPEVL_EN.iso target.Size = 512325632 target.CRC32 = ffffffff target.SHA1 = 8f549c15d3388dd21979de4e925254a0d8a665ec
I have only a trial Product Key for Windows XP Professional 120 Day Evaluation Version with SP2. Now I'm testing the ISO with my Product Key. When the Product Key given a errormessage, where can I find a trial PK for the RTM Version? Thank you for your great help. Edit: The Product Key from the SP2 Evaluationversion is still function for the RTM Evaluation Version.
Hi, I have another question to you all. Now I'am searching a genuine german OEM SP1 or SP1a ISO of Windows XP Professional. Can you help me please? Thank you.
it woud be nice to check your isos first before you post such hashes e322b6301ecd524e338f97d4588d3522741eab44 <- overdumped (zero padded) = Invalid ISO9660 and 20000627 is probably realy a wrong Timestamp (year) all as valid confimed SP2 isos have a 2001 Timesamp part and winworldpc is realy not a serious sorce winworldpc AKA home of homebrew
Sorry to interfere but i have to agree with @vanelle This is a dump of an original iso and remastered. And AUTOCRC can not be trusted in this context. Or any context (personal opinion)
Vanelle himself publishes all Windows 2000 SHAs in PTG language but how, the other game the AutoCRC was law, now it is no longer trusted never read such a contradictory forum as MDL
Interesting Thanks for pointing out SHA1's. My opinion still stand - remastered. AutoCRC is a checksum algo, not a secure hash algo like MD5, SHA1 etc. It is easily altered (i recently struggled to remaster an image with official SHA1 available and noticed that i could change byte values in several sectors without ruin autocrc, SHA1 would change of course) Quite surprising but i had to follow a few rules. I would define AutoCRC as quoted from: CRC Verification Utility, Version 3.05 AutoCRC indicates the media in X:\ is VALID An indication, and maybe lowercase letters on "VALID" as well. To make it a little less De-Facto and a little more "this is what it is"
perfectly agree with you ... also because all the versions I have are dated 2001 but since here on MDL the user Vanelle is "law" and he himself had published it, I thought it was an atypical version ..